- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hampton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
>
>
> SN wrote:
>
> >You are absolutely wrong, I&
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:52:05PM -0600, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> --
> This says this is NOT the standard.
Speaking of standards, where are the following headers defined?
Thread-Topic:
Thread-Index:
I can't find them in RFC2822.
Brent (and how come nobody is flaming about line length
no ofcourse you cant sue him, and i hope you meant it as a joke, when i
started this thread, i didnt mean to complain to gentoo mailinglist! i
was just courious to know if it happend to other ppl.
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 16:18, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Paul Hampton wrote:
> > The gentoo-user list is
> > > The gentoo-user list is archived here for example - say
> > hello to your
> > > email address!
> > >
> > > http://www.cubik.ca/archives/gentoo-user/msg00840.html
> > >
> >
> > And who is responsable for that archive*? Can I sue
> > he/she/them for publishing
> > my e-mail address?
> >
>
, December 03, 2003 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> > The gentoo-user list is archived here for example - say
> hello to your
> > email address!
> >
> > http://www.cubik.ca/archives/gentoo-user/msg00840.html
> >
>
> And who is responsable for that archive*? Can I sue
> he/she/them for publishing
> my e-mail address?
>
> Norberto
>
> [*] sorr
Paul Hampton wrote:
> The gentoo-user list is archived here for example - say hello to your
> email address!
>
> http://www.cubik.ca/archives/gentoo-user/msg00840.html
>
And who is responsable for that archive*? Can I sue he/she/them for publishing
my e-mail address?
Norberto
[*] sorry, I'm on
SN wrote:
You are absolutely wrong, I'm subscribed to a couple of the mandrake
mailinglists as well, never got any spam through that list.
The mailinglist should prevent adress collection, of course if the
mailinglist and webfrontends show the plain emailadress spiders easily pick
them up.
Hi
I guesss you were confused and dizzy in the first place.
- Original Message -
From: "Helgi Örn Helgason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
>
ginal Message -
From: "Helgi Örn Helgason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gentoo Maillinglist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
> On 2003-12-01, Redeeman wrote:
Matthew Baxa wrote:
No, I think he meant that if the bottom posters don't trim posts, its
worse cause you have to scroll down a lot to get to the meat of the
message.
If such msgs appear and i'm not especially interested, i just
delete them... too lazy to scroll down. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin
William Kenworthy wrote:
> Bottom posters, especially those that that fail to trim there posts are
> a real pain in many modern mail readers ...
Same goes for top posters that do not trim the junk they left below...
Please, both, top posters and bottom posters. Can you please quote
ONLY
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:27:02 +0800
William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Better yet, make it configurable so us top posters can bin the bottom
> posters as well!
Bottom posting sounds more like do-it-yourself pr0n than mailing list
discussion :)
> Bottom posters, especially those that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
|On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:27:02 +0800 William Kenworthy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>Bottom posters, especially those that that fail to trim there posts are
|>a real pain in many modern mail readers ...
|
|
|And just why would y
> > But, like I said, if you show me this law that says we are
> all wrong,
> > and your right, I will bow to the Collins law of proper netiquette.
>
> See http://www.albury.net.au/new-users/rfc1855.txt and search for top
Few Things:
one, This is not LAW, this is, and I quote "Netiquette Guidel
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:40, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 17:01, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> > But, like I said, if you show me this law that says we are all wrong,
> > and your right, I will bow to the Collins law of proper netiquette.
>
> See http://www.albury.net.au/new-users/rfc18
On Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 17:01, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> But, like I said, if you show me this law that says we are all wrong,
> and your right, I will bow to the Collins law of proper netiquette.
See http://www.albury.net.au/new-users/rfc1855.txt and search for top
Peter
--
==
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 11:29, Collins Richey wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:27:02 +0800 William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Bottom posters, especially those that that fail to trim there posts are
> > a real pain in many modern mail readers ...
>
> And just why would you think tha
> And just why would you think that only bottom posters fail to
> trim their posts?
> That's even more likely with top posting - just start keying
> away at the top of
> the reply without looking at what was quoted below.
Geez, I still can't believe people piss and moan about crap like this. Is
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:27:02 +0800 William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bottom posters, especially those that that fail to trim there posts are
> a real pain in many modern mail readers ...
And just why would you think that only bottom posters fail to trim their posts?
That's even
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:01:14 -0600 "Jeffrey Smelser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But, like I said, if you show me this law that says we are all wrong, and your
> right, I will bow to the Collins law of proper netiquette.
>
Interestingly enough, "Collins' law" cannot be found via a simple google
> Unfortunately it's not just newbies or Outlook-challenged
> posters who do top
> postings. There are confirmed top-posters (disgusting as
> this may be) on every
> list who are well aware of what they are doing and who could
> care less about
> netiquette.
>
> IMO, the proper way to handle t
> -Original Message-
> From: Collins Richey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
>
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:10:49 +0100 "Matthias
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:10:49 +0100 "Matthias F. Brandstetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> > No, I am sorry, i know I was not being polite. After a few weeks reading
> > this list I got kind of frustrated by all these top-postings, they make
> > me
-- quoting Redeeman --
> just to do as you do, :) but i like to write stuff in the top of the
> email!
then do so ... I think no one will ever shoot you because of top quotes ;)
--
Why did this have to happen now, during prime time, when TV's
brightest stars come out to shine?
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 17:12, Redeeman wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:10, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> > -- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> > > No, I am sorry, i know I was not being polite. After a few weeks reading
> > > this list I got kind of frustrated by all these top-p
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:10, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> -- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> > No, I am sorry, i know I was not being polite. After a few weeks reading
> > this list I got kind of frustrated by all these top-postings, they make
> > me dizzy and confused...:o|
>
Better yet, make it configurable so us top posters can bin the bottom
posters as well!
Bottom posters, especially those that that fail to trim there posts are
a real pain in many modern mail readers ...
:)
BillK
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 22:14, Spider wrote:
> begin quote
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:1
begin quote
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:18:46 -0500
Alexander Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 6:11:45 AM, Matthias wrote:
>
> ObGentoo: Its really, really easy to pull up and configure one of
> the innumerable Bayesian mail filtering systems on your server.
Tuesday, December 2, 2003, 6:11:45 AM, Matthias wrote:
MFB> questions in a wrong manner. But: where should I have learned it, if
MFB> not on the list itself?
Well, in the old days, we used to learn by actually reading the ML for a
while before posting to it and seeing how the folks who d
-- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> No, I am sorry, i know I was not being polite. After a few weeks reading
> this list I got kind of frustrated by all these top-postings, they make
> me dizzy and confused...:o|
I am on your side, I don't like them either. And I also think that one
On 2003-12-02, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
>
> -- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> > Some clear signs of a mailinglist newbie:
> > * Top mailing.
> > * Never tidying up a RE: message.
> > * Lot of OT stuff.
> And? You got born as a mailinglist expert super pro?
>
No, absolutely
-- quoting Helgi Örn Helgason --
> Some clear signs of a mailinglist newbie:
> * Top mailing.
> * Never tidying up a RE: message.
> * Lot of OT stuff.
And? You got born as a mailinglist expert super pro?
Sorry, this isn't ment as offensive as it might look, but I don't like this
On 2003-12-01, Redeeman wrote:
> i thought about make an account for mailinglists too, but i didnt do it,
> sadly :(
>
> On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 22:27, SN wrote:
> > Yeah I have about 8 email accounts: work-related, private and so on, but
> > this one really gets spammed heavily.I'm just happy, that
t;
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Redeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Gentoo Maillinglist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:14 PM
> Subject: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
>
>
Monday, December 01, 2003 4:14 PM
Subject: [gentoo-user] spam after subscribing to gentoo-user
> hi, before i subscriped to this list i got no spam at all, but after
> subscribing it startet, anyone else experienced this?
>
> if yes, then i recommend spamasassin for filtering it :D
>
Redeeman wrote:
> hi, before i subscriped to this list i got no spam at all, but after
> subscribing it startet, anyone else experienced this?
>
> if yes, then i recommend spamasassin for filtering it :D
>
> --
> Regards, Redeeman
> () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
> /\
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 01 December 2003 15:49, Jeffrey Smelser wrote:
> Yes, I just set up a new email over the weekend at home, I am already
> getting Microsoft patched and return mail BS.. Someone is posting the
> emails on a web site somewhere...
>
> > hi, befor
Yes, I just set up a new email over the weekend at home, I am already getting
Microsoft patched and return mail BS.. Someone is posting the emails on a web site
somewhere...
> hi, before i subscriped to this list i got no spam at all, but after
> subscribing it startet, anyone else experienced
hi, before i subscriped to this list i got no spam at all, but after
subscribing it startet, anyone else experienced this?
if yes, then i recommend spamasassin for filtering it :D
--
Regards, Redeeman
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\- against microsoft
40 matches
Mail list logo
