rd wrote:
And if they are NOT be munged -- WHY WHY WHY not!!!
-rdg
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 17:40, Steven Elling wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 22:09, FX wrote:
I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
the
MS update attached crap email
and
some with undeliverable Mail:User
And if they are NOT be munged -- WHY WHY WHY not!!!
-rdg
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 17:40, Steven Elling wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 22:09, FX wrote:
> > I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
> >
> > the
> > MS update attached crap email
> > and
> > some with undeliverable Ma
Steven Elling wrote:
So, if any of you out there are using MS Lookout... I mean Outlook...
without a virus scanner, shame on you.
Better wish them luck. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 22:09, FX wrote:
> I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
>
> the
> MS update attached crap email
> and
> some with undeliverable Mail:User Unknown
I'm getting the same ones. I'm starting to get up to around 10 a day.
But the thing is most of the MS wo
the senders assume ppl are using windows, and it is ofcourse not
microsoft thats sending it, probably some ppl that hates m$ :)
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 16:54, Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
> FX wrote:
>
> >I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
> >
> >the
> > MS update attached crap e
FX wrote:
I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
the
MS update attached crap email
and
some with undeliverable Mail:User Unknown
I found it its the SWEN bug.
great it is from back in Sept.
http://antivirus.about.com/cs/virusencyclopedia/p/gibef.htm
Yes, it's exactly my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 November 2003 10:48 pm, rd wrote:
> True, SA is missing it here too! Is there any way or any thing that we
> should be doing to feedback this info to the SA project??
You not using SA's learning mechanism?? It can learn about spam if you
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:48:42 -0600
rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, SA is missing it here too! Is there any way or any thing that
> we should be doing to feedback this info to the SA project??
>
> -rdg
SA's focus is on detecting UCE, not virii. If you want a quick fix, try
score MICROSOFT
Using razor2 and giving it a high score should prevent them from coming
through. My connection is very slow, however, and if razor2 times out then
its score doesn't count.
On Monday 01 December 2003 13:48, rd wrote:
> True, SA is missing it here too! Is there any way or any thing
True, SA is missing it here too! Is there any way or any thing that we
should be doing to feedback this info to the SA project??
-rdg
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 22:23, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2003 13:09, FX wrote:
> > I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
> >
> >
On Monday 01 December 2003 13:09, FX wrote:
> I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
>
> the
> MS update attached crap email
> and
> some with undeliverable Mail:User Unknown
>
> I found it its the SWEN bug.
> great it is from back in Sept.
I'v
I started getting it on Nov 18th. two or three a day.
the
MS update attached crap email
and
some with undeliverable Mail:User Unknown
I found it its the SWEN bug.
great it is from back in Sept.
http://antivirus.about.com/cs/virusencyclopedia/p/gibef.htm
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 15:49, [EMA
rd wrote:
Yes, in the last 4 days I have received about 6 or 8 MS viri payloads!!
Too bad for those using MS desktops!!
Not with a good email client, but bad for those who ru outlook...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Why? Outlook XP/2003 block access to them by default. To this day I have not
been able to figure out how to disable that.
-Original Message-
From: rd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 10:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Did anony receive
Yes, in the last 4 days I have received about 6 or 8 MS viri payloads!!
Too bad for those using MS desktops!!
-rdg
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 18:25, Jon Liebold wrote:
> I get fake MS security bulletins... Which is kinda ironic But MS does
> confirm that it's some [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^&&^$#@& tryin
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:12:55 -0800 (PST)
Dennis Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This looks to me to be a variant on the 419 scam. Such messages
> should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Presumably they will take
> action against the scammers, but with a traffic volume of over 10,000
> messag
I get fake MS security bulletins... Which is kinda ironic But MS does
confirm that it's some [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^&&^$#@& trying to spread virii.
-Original Message-
From: SN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] D
This looks to me to be a variant on the 419 scam. Such messages should be
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Presumably they will take action against
the scammers, but with a traffic volume of over 10,000 messages a month
they may be a bit behind and losing ground.
>
> CONGRATULATIONS! CONGRATULATIONS!
SN wrote:
I'm getting lots of spam and virus mails to the account I use for the gentoo
mailinglist lately.
I did not get that mail, but I got viruses and "unable to deliver"
messages, too
:-(
For me it looks like some of us who get this newsletter read mails with
Windows and hav thmeselves a vi
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:42:40 +0100
"SN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting lots of spam and virus mails to the account I use for the
> gentoo mailinglist lately.
>
That sort of crap doesn't make it thru the filters here, but I see signs
of it in the maillog, as much in the last 3 or 4 days
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SN wrote:
| I'm getting lots of spam and virus mails to the account I use for
| the gentoo mailinglist lately.
|
|
Nope. But you did score a 2.4/5 on SA. Congratulations. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using G
21 matches
Mail list logo
