On 8 August 2015 at 20:11, Jonathan Callen wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 08/08/2015 01:37 PM, James wrote:
> > James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> >
> >> there is *no we* in nix unless your or I step up. Fair enough!
> >> ::
> >
> >> git clone --bare https://git
Hi Paul,
i added the rootdelay to kernelcmdline
and after reboot machine lvm was fine and all Partitions mounted. I will See If
this works next reboots too.
Thanks for the tipp
Am 10. August 2015 22:52:57 MESZ, schrieb Paul Tobias :
>> my ideas is that LVM2 is not ready at the time of mounting
>
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> And it works fine with 4.2.0-rc2 for me. Did you remember to re-emerge app-
> emulation/virtualbox-modules (after setting the /usr/src/linux symlink to the
> new kernel source)?
So it seems I wasn't the only one with the problem on 4.2 (linux):
h
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 06:47:30 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:01 AM, gevisz wrote:
> > Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that
> > my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the
> > * timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry
> > if thi
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:25:09 +0300 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 12 August 2015 at 11:20, gevisz wrote:
> > 2015-08-12 11:10 GMT+03:00 Alon Bar-Lev :
> >> I am waiting as well... :)
> >>
> >> In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any more.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > What is the shotcoming
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:06:55 +0200
Marko Weber | 8000 wrote:
Are the partitions typed as raid auto-detect (fd)?
Or are you expecting an initrd to assemble the RAID from config data?
May be an issue with timing in the initrd if the latter.
Also try making sure that all of the components required
On 12/08/2015 12:59, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:18:54 -0400, covici wrote:
>>
>>> Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>
Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:18:54 -0400, covici wrote:
>
> > Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote:
> >> >> Hello,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just for grins, I'm thinking about
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:01 AM, gevisz wrote:
> Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that
> my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the
> * timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry
> if this way of syncing my portage tree still works and will
> work in the
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:18:54 -0400, covici wrote:
> Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>
>> > On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system that
>> >> is (~) t
Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> > On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system
> >> that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 as the
> >> defaul
On 12 August 2015 at 11:20, gevisz wrote:
> 2015-08-12 11:10 GMT+03:00 Alon Bar-Lev :
>> I am waiting as well... :)
>>
>> In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any more.
>
> Why?
>
> What is the shotcomings of using that script directly?
I hope that in time it will be removed in
2015-08-12 11:10 GMT+03:00 Alon Bar-Lev :
> I am waiting as well... :)
>
> In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any more.
Why?
What is the shotcomings of using that script directly?
> Create:
> /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf
I do have such a file, but there stands:
[DEF
I am waiting as well... :)
In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any more.
Create:
/etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf
---
[DEFAULT]
main-repo = gentoo
[gentoo]
location = /usr/portage
sync-type = webrsync
---
Then use:
# emerge --sync
On 12 August 2015 at 11:01, gevisz wr
Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that
my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the
* timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry
if this way of syncing my portage tree still works and will
work in the future.
# emerge-webrsync
Fetching most recent snapshot
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:01:50 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 05:29:04 PM, James wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just for grins, I'm thinking about installing a gentoo system
>> that is (~) testing and newer codes and setting gcc-.5.2 as the
>> default compiler. Anyone doing this yet? Will it
16 matches
Mail list logo
