Ok,
thanks for the explanation.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Saturday 09 June 2007 14:06:59 Marko Kocić wrote:
> > occasionally crashes. If you meant 1.4 or 1.5 then they simply don't seem
> > to use the c++ standard library...
>
> I don't know the difference between Sun and gentoo packaging. Maybe
> Sun is statically linking that ABI stuff.
Right. If yo
On 6/9/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I'm already running sun-jdk on my machine that I manually
> downloaded and installed from the sun site, although I don't have
> libstdc++ installed.
> One thing I don't understand is why do I need libstdc++ when using
> portage versio
On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:02:00 Marko Kocić wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> > The reason is as you say that dev-java/sun-jdk:1.6 is a binary package
> > that isn't ABI compatible with libstdc++.so.6 (from gcc-4.x). And as we
> > don't have the source we cannot fix that with revdep-rebu
Thanks for the clarification.
The reason is as you say that dev-java/sun-jdk:1.6 is a binary package that
isn't ABI compatible with libstdc++.so.6 (from gcc-4.x). And as we don't have
the source we cannot fix that with revdep-rebuild.
But I'm already running sun-jdk on my machine that I manual
On Saturday 09 June 2007 11:46:52 Marko Kocić wrote:
> Why does sun-jdk needs gcc-3.3.6 and and libstdc++-3.3?
> As I understand sun-jdk-1.6.0.01 is a binary package, and java works
> just fine if downloaded and installed from Sun site, without portage.
>
> Since I don't have enough disk spac fro a
Why does sun-jdk needs gcc-3.3.6 and and libstdc++-3.3?
As I understand sun-jdk-1.6.0.01 is a binary package, and java works
just fine if downloaded and installed from Sun site, without portage.
Since I don't have enough disk spac fro another gcc, is it possible to
somehow let portage handle sun-
7 matches
Mail list logo
