Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Coverage metadata level

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Some answers to your questions. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In "Image I/O metadata for multidimensional coverage" document > > > > 5. ImageIO MetaData for Multidimensional Coverages overview > > --- > > In or

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Stream metadata

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Martin, Here below, some answers to part of your questions. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > General note: some nodes begin with a lower case, and some other nodes > begin with a upper case. It may be worth to clarify what is the policy > for lower/upper cases. In

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Martin, Excuse me for my delayed reply. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Daniele Romagnoli from Geosolution recently send us a document on > Coverage I/O metadata. It sound like a very good draft to me. In the > next bunch of emails, I'm going to comment some sectio

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData

2007-09-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin; one of the things we are chasing up with Raj and the OSGeo foundation is the ability to get into the process a bit more. Right now this email is interesting in a social sense (yeah something happening with image metadata, and even better you are pleased with it). But the details are