Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 13:17 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > It's not clear what "Save Visible Layers" would do. Would it save the
> > merged image of all visible layers into a single layer
> Yes. I.e. like doing a flatten and then a
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 08:08 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> It's not clear what "Save Visible Layers" would do. Would it save the
> merged image of all visible layers into a single layer
Yes. I.e. like doing a flatten and then a save and then an undo.
I don't have strong feelings about it, but sinc
>From my user perspective, I'm ok with the save / export separation.
- Save only for XCF
- Export for other formats (using the current method, guess format by
extension, or manual selection of the output format).
We users are used to save anything, despite if it's a lossy format or
not, and that's
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:45 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
>
>>> I don't quite understand. What dialog is useless?
>> "Export file..." dialog you get on saves to formats that are not xcf. It
>> does ask in some formats for conversion options but I doubt many people
>>
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:45 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
> > I don't quite understand. What dialog is useless?
> "Export file..." dialog you get on saves to formats that are not xcf. It
> does ask in some formats for conversion options but I doubt many people
> have ever done anything else th
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:14 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
>
>> So basically the whole dialog is useless and could just as well be
>> replaced by assuming that the user clicked "Export..." and maybe a
>> notice in save dialog that any other format except xcf may cause
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 09:14 +0300, Alexia Death wrote:
> So basically the whole dialog is useless and could just as well be
> replaced by assuming that the user clicked "Export..." and maybe a
> notice in save dialog that any other format except xcf may cause some
> data loss. That should
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 17:54 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
>
>>> Could make sense to ask on the gimp-user list. But as far as I can see,
>>> saving the current drawable is the only reasonable use case. We might
>>> want to consider to make this easier by adding "Save La
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 17:54 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> > Could make sense to ask on the gimp-user list. But as far as I can see,
> > saving the current drawable is the only reasonable use case. We might
> > want to consider to make this easier by adding "Save Layer" and removing
> > the "I
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 23:46 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
[...]
> Could make sense to ask on the gimp-user list. But as far as I can see,
> saving the current drawable is the only reasonable use case. We might
> want to consider to make this easier by adding "Save Layer" and removing
> the "Ignore" ch
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 12:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> from the docs:
> The export file dialog shows up if the image type does not match the format
> capabilites.
> If the user chooses 'Export', a suitably altered copy of the image is used
> for saving.
> If the user chooses 'Ignore'
Hi,
from the docs:
The export file dialog shows up if the image type does not match the format
capabilites.
If the user chooses 'Export', a suitably altered copy of the image is used for
saving.
If the user chooses 'Ignore', the image is fed directly to the save plugin
instead.
Are there examp
12 matches
Mail list logo
