Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-24 Thread via GitHub


k8ika0s commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3572884032

   @kou Sounds good
   Closing this and will continue to provide support in other related 
PRs/Issues. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-23 Thread via GitHub


kou commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3568750269

   Thanks. If you find missed changed in the PRs from @Vishwanatha-HD, could 
you open a separated (smaller) issues/PRs for them?
   
   Can we close this in favor of #48151?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-23 Thread via GitHub


k8ika0s commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3568309154

   Thanks, @kou  — that makes sense.
   
   The big diff in #48212 is mostly because I pulled in fresh upstream commits 
before adding my endianness work, so it looks a lot noisier than it really is. 
But I totally get that reviewing a giant PR like that isn’t practical.
   
   I’ll start going through the PRs from @Vishwanatha-HD and add technical 
feedback there, especially around keeping the behavior consistent for canonical 
little-endian I/O on s390x.
   
   If you or the other maintainers eventually want me to break out pieces of my 
work into smaller, focused PRs, I’m happy to do that — just let me know the 
direction you prefer and I’ll follow it.
   
   Appreciate the guidance!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-22 Thread via GitHub


kou commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3566728048

   OK. Could you review PRs from @Vishwanatha-HD instead of 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/48212 ?
   #48212 has many unrelated changes. We can't review #48212.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-21 Thread via GitHub


k8ika0s commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3564965515

   I don't know @Vishwanathan-HD. This is my own work, done without any 
knowledge someone else was about to put up a PR for what I had been working on. 
   
   Also for context, here is the detailed technical write-up of the s390x issue 
discovery, testing methodology, and architecture-level design approach:
   
   [](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/apache-arrow-parquet-ibm-s390x-kaitlyn-davis-f7nkc)
   
   This PR is the implementation of that research.  
   
   Even if some parts end up merged separately or differently, I'm happy to 
collaborate and ensure the final s390x solution is consistent, canonical, and 
maintainable across the Arrow/Parquet C++ codebase.
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



Re: [I] [C++][Parquet] Fix endianness and test failures on s390x (big-endian) [arrow]

2025-11-21 Thread via GitHub


kou commented on issue #48213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48213#issuecomment-3564944813

   @Vishwanatha-HD created #48151 and sub-issues and opened PRS for them. Is 
this duplicate of them?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]