On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> On Thu, December 16, 2010 5:03 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 schrieb Geert Janssens:
>>> On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
> The last co
On Thu, December 16, 2010 5:03 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 schrieb Geert Janssens:
>> On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
>> > > The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebui
Am Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
> > > The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt my
> > > working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash
Am Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 schrieb David T.:
> (sheepish)
>
> Um, yeah.
>
> I will think about whether there is a better way to present that list so
> it's clearer what each entry is for. If I come up with something, I'll
> chime in again.
>
> I wasn't complaining about the locked nature o
Am Dienstag, 14. Dezember 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> Sounds good. What, if anything, is required for a 2.4.0 official release
> over and above 2.3.X RC release?
Given the current lack of resources for activities beyond getting the code
running, I would say just make the same steps as usual.
I've committed the patch for this bug. In a couple of days I will have a
(small) patch also for documenting trading account [1] because I think
it deserves to be in the docs: at the moment I'm studiyng where to put it.
While talking about documentation I've found a couple of problems
running x
--- On Thu, 12/16/10, Derek Atkins wrote:
> From: Derek Atkins
> Subject: Re: Let's really release 2.4.0 soon
> To: "David T."
> Cc: "gnucash-devel" , "Christian Stimming"
>
> Date: Thursday, December 16, 2010, 5:21 AM
> "David T."
> writes:
>
> >> Yes, but the documentation can generally
Hello !
Am 16.12.2010 15:25, schrieb Mike Evans:
>
> One small thing, patches should be references from the base directory not from
>
> src, that's to say the patch path should start with src/blah/blah/ . Things
>
> can get confusing if the path is not consistent.
>
>
I'm sorry for that ! I must
On Wednesday 15 Dec 2010 13:16:30 Christoph Holtermann wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I just worked out how to access the contents of the glist returned by
> comm_table.get_namespaces_list(). I added a patch to [1]. Would
> you be so kind to have a look at it ?
Thanks for that, commited.
One small thing,
Dear Sir;
I noticed that the In ( Reports à Sample & Custom à Custom Multicolumn
Report ) is not showing more than one chart and gives the following error (
Unable to bush bar chart ).
Gnucash Ver. 2.3.17.
Thanks
Sanussi
___
gnucash-dev
On 12/16/2010 08:55 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
"David T." writes:
Yes, but the documentation can generally be released after
2.4.0. IMHO.
Sure. I was mainly expressing concern about the file format issues
that the new version raises. There has
(sheepish)
Um, yeah.
I will think about whether there is a better way to present that list so it's
clearer what each entry is for. If I come up with something, I'll chime in
again.
I wasn't complaining about the locked nature of the page; I was just heading
off the inevitable "it's a wiki" co
Geert Janssens writes:
> On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote:
>> Sounds good. What, if anything, is required for a 2.4.0 official release
>> over and above 2.3.X RC release?
>>
>> As usual, I'll do the tarballs and release notes.
>>
>> Phil
>> -
>> I used to be a hypocho
On Wednesday 15 Dec 2010 13:16:30 Christoph Holtermann wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I just worked out how to access the contents of the glist returned by
> comm_table.get_namespaces_list(). I added a patch to [1]. Would
> you be so kind to have a look at it ?
>
> regards,
>
> Christoph Holtermann
>
Th
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Sounds good. What, if anything, is required for a 2.4.0 official release
> over and above 2.3.X RC release?
>
> As usual, I'll do the tarballs and release notes.
>
> Phil
> -
> I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I too
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
> "David T." writes:
> > As a user, I agree, although it would be nice if 635357 were addressed.
>
> Yes, but the documentation can generally be released after 2.4.0. IMHO.
>
Sure, I think it would be best to get the important documentation upd
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
> "David T." writes:
> >> Yes, but the documentation can generally be released after
> >> 2.4.0. IMHO.
> >
> > Sure. I was mainly expressing concern about the file format issues
> > that the new version raises. There has been work on this bug by
Hi,
Geert Janssens writes:
> On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
>> > The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt my
>> > working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash screen shows
>> > 'built from
Zitat von Geert Janssens :
> The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt my
> working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash screen shows
> 'built from svn r19910 on 2010-12-06' even though this is not the
> case.
Same problem here since a couple of days. No update
"David T." writes:
>> Yes, but the documentation can generally be released after
>> 2.4.0. IMHO.
>
> Sure. I was mainly expressing concern about the file format issues
> that the new version raises. There has been work on this bug by
> Cristian Marchi today, and it looks like my concerns are add
Christoph Holtermann writes:
> On Bugzilla I posted the same question and Mike Evans answered :
>
> "Since glib.i doesn't appear in Makefile.am I am assuming(!) that it's
> obsolete
> and it's functionality has been moved to base-typemaps.i. If someone confirms
> this is the case I think it shou
On Thursday 16 December 2010, jh wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
> > The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt my
> > working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash screen shows
> > 'built from svn r19910 on 2010-12-06' even thoug
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 21:34 -0800, J. Alex Aycinena wrote:
> The last couple of times that I've done an 'svn update' and rebuilt my
> working copy of gnucash, I've noticed that the splash screen shows
> 'built from svn r19910 on 2010-12-06' even though this is not the
> case. The 'About ...' shows
23 matches
Mail list logo
