Re: Compile error

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On 28.01.2011, at 15:35, J. Alex Aycinena wrote: > I get the following error in compiling trunk: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /home/gnucash-dev/svncheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/dbi/gnc-backend-dbi.c: > In function 'conn_test_dbi_library': > /home/gnucash-dev/svncheckouts/gnu

Compile error

2011-01-28 Thread J. Alex Aycinena
I get the following error in compiling trunk: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/gnucash-dev/svncheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/dbi/gnc-backend-dbi.c: In function 'conn_test_dbi_library': /home/gnucash-dev/svncheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/dbi/gnc-backend-dbi.c:2902:2: error: imp

Re: I can't find working libdbi version

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 6:56 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Christoph Holtermann wrote: > >> Hello ! >>> Good catch. I've changed the way doubles are serialized in r20177; please >>> give it a try. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John Ralls >>> >> Thanks ! "make check" runs through

Re: SQL Version

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > Geert Janssens writes: > >> On Friday 28 January 2011, John Ralls wrote: I just remembered the discussion some time ago about the choice of the revision number as table version number. I am building GnuCash from a local git repo,

Re: SQL Version

2011-01-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Geert Janssens writes: > On Friday 28 January 2011, John Ralls wrote: >> > I just remembered the discussion some time ago about the choice of the >> > revision number as table version number. I am building GnuCash from a >> > local git repo, which I keep synchronized with svn. Perhaps that's the

Re: SQL Version

2011-01-28 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 28 January 2011, John Ralls wrote: > > I just remembered the discussion some time ago about the choice of the > > revision number as table version number. I am building GnuCash from a > > local git repo, which I keep synchronized with svn. Perhaps that's the > > cause ? > > Possible, I s

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread Donald Allen
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > On Fri, January 28, 2011 11:15 am, Donald Allen wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, John Ralls

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread Derek Atkins
On Fri, January 28, 2011 11:15 am, Donald Allen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, John Ralls wrote: > >> >> On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, John Ralls wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> >> d

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread Donald Allen
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, John Ralls wrote: > >> >> On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Donald Allen wrote: >> >> > On a FreeBSD 8.1, I've downloaded the 2.4 tarball. When I run >> '

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > On a FreeBSD 8.1, I've downloaded the 2.4 tarball. When I run 'configure', I > > get > > > > checking for gzopen in -lz... yes

Re: sqlite3 assumed in python example script account_analysis.py ?

2011-01-28 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 28 January 2011, Derek Atkins wrote: > Mark Jenkins writes: > >> There is a comment in the script that says it only supports sqlite3 > >> files. The way the session is opened does indeed limit the choice of > >> input files to sqlite3. > >> > >> I'm just wondering, why was this done ? >

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread Donald Allen
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > > On a FreeBSD 8.1, I've downloaded the 2.4 tarball. When I run > 'configure', I > > get > > > > checking for gzopen in -lz... yes > > configure: External QOF Disabled. Using Internal QOF

Re: Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > On a FreeBSD 8.1, I've downloaded the 2.4 tarball. When I run 'configure', I > get > > checking for gzopen in -lz... yes > configure: External QOF Disabled. Using Internal QOF Code. > checking dbi/dbi.h usability... no > checking dbi/dbi.h pres

Re: I can't find working libdbi version

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:26 AM, Christoph Holtermann wrote: > Hello ! >> Good catch. I've changed the way doubles are serialized in r20177; please >> give it a try. >> >> Regards, >> John Ralls >> > Thanks ! "make check" runs through without errors. > > gnucash still doesn't like libdbi. Log say

Re: SQL Version

2011-01-28 Thread John Ralls
On Jan 28, 2011, at 1:07 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > On Thursday 27 January 2011, John Ralls wrote: >> On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: >>> On Thursday 27 January 2011, Geert Janssens wrote: I seem to have some issues with the table versioning that was added recently.

Re: sqlite3 assumed in python example script account_analysis.py ?

2011-01-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Mark Jenkins writes: >> There is a comment in the script that says it only supports sqlite3 files. >> The >> way the session is opened does indeed limit the choice of input files to >> sqlite3. >> >> I'm just wondering, why was this done ? > > Only to make invoking it on the command line more

Building problem on FreeBSD 8.1

2011-01-28 Thread Donald Allen
On a FreeBSD 8.1, I've downloaded the 2.4 tarball. When I run 'configure', I get checking for gzopen in -lz... yes configure: External QOF Disabled. Using Internal QOF Code. checking dbi/dbi.h usability... no checking dbi/dbi.h presence... no checking for dbi/dbi.h... no configure: error: Unable

Since last run window

2011-01-28 Thread Cristian Marchi
I need a little help on finalizing a patch to close an old documentation bug about the since last run window [1]. I don't know exactly what "Ignored" and "Postponed" do. I also see from po file that there are two strings ("Never" and "Need Value") that comes from the file "dialog-sx-since-last-

Sqlite3 on cifs mounted share

2011-01-28 Thread Geert Janssens
Just a heads-up to the other devs: I have been investigating an issue where GnuCash failed to load an sqlite3 based data file when this is located on a cifs mounted share. It seems sqlite3 requires a locking mechanishm (brl) that doesn't work in all combinations of clients and servers. The work

Re: I can't find working libdbi version

2011-01-28 Thread Christoph Holtermann
Hello ! > Good catch. I've changed the way doubles are serialized in r20177; please > give it a try. > > Regards, > John Ralls > Thanks ! "make check" runs through without errors. gnucash still doesn't like libdbi. Log says : * 13:13:08 WARN [conn_test_dbi_library()] Test_DBI_Library: Double F

Re: I can't find working libdbi version

2011-01-28 Thread Christoph Holtermann
Hello ! Am 27.01.2011 14:12, schrieb Christoph Holtermann: > Hello ! > > I posted that thing also in libdbi-devel mailing list. and got two interesting replies : http://www.mail-archive.com/libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00339.html http://www.mail-archive.com/libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.

Re: SQL Version

2011-01-28 Thread Geert Janssens
On Thursday 27 January 2011, John Ralls wrote: > On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Geert Janssens wrote: > > On Thursday 27 January 2011, Geert Janssens wrote: > >> I seem to have some issues with the table versioning that was added > >> recently. I have an sqlite3 based book and whenever I open it, Gnu

Re: r20169 - gnucash/trunk/src/plugins/bi_import - Open the newly created invoices for editing after import.

2011-01-28 Thread Mike Evans
On Thursday 27 Jan 2011 19:04:29 Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 27. Januar 2011 schrieb Mike Evans: > > > However, I admit this is almost impossible to guess if you don't test > > > this with a separate builddir build on your own. In this particular > > > case, I think you only need -I$