Jeffrey
Fairly straightforward:
1. None, and from neither of the for profit companies I preside (though for
full disclosure I'd really hope they'd be more profitable but just as the other
shareholder, I do prefer treating clients and employees generously and this
weighs heavily in the balance)
Eric:
I have two questions.
1. For the record, does your for-profit business or do you personally have any
business relationship with any of the publishers or journals on my lists? If
so, which ones?
2. In your email you refer to a recently-published article, and you name and
discuss the seco
Dear list members:
What started as a one-man, useful list that identified “Potential, possible, or
probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers”, which Jeffrey himself
further qualifies as a “list of questionable, scholarly open-access
publishers”, has now overshot its usefulness. We need
Hello,
I have seen reports about cost-effective journal projects in this
communication, so I decided to tell you about three open access (Open
Journal Systems) journal efforts of mine.
1) Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society, Section A: Chemistry (active
for two years, accepting articles abo
Since advertising has started, let me mention that the CCSD inFrance has
developed an overlay journal platform that would exactly do the trick here:
Episciences.org
See the ELPUB paper: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01002815
Laurent
> Le 2 oct. 2015 à 11:52, Raf Dekeyser a écrit :
>
> Dear all,
>
Dear all,
Do these people realize that there is a free alternative for managing the peer review system: the
Open Journal System (OJS)?
It is easy to install, and you do not have to use it for the final publication of the papers: just
use the peer review management
part of it!
Raf Dekeyser
LIB
