Can you try and let us all know? it may be the solution you're looking for.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Tapir wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, February 21, 2014 5:39:17 AM UTC+8, Rafael Sanches wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried playframework? They have optimizations to make your life
>> easier when devel
Emanuele, I'm not going to disagree with your points, I think there is
validity to what you say. I would like to make a counter-point though.
I think that there are many standard 'good software engineering practices',
which are only good in a historical and pragmatic sense. What i mean is
that t
So if I understood correctly, the 250GB index limit is now 10GB's?!
(Again, if I understood correctly, the 10gb per unlimited indexes limit
seems a bit bullshity to me, as one could also have created multiple apps
to increase the total limit in that manner, as others have previously done
for oth
On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:03:43 AM UTC+8, Jay wrote:
>
> Tapir, I really do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Tim
> was sharing his thoughts and you come back with childish stuff like this.
> You are asking people to contribute their success stories to your other
> thread.
Tapir, I really do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Tim
was sharing his thoughts and you come back with childish stuff like this.
You are asking people to contribute their success stories to your other
thread. You have made some choices in how you responded in this thread. I
do
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael >
> wrote:
>
>> The scheduler logic
>>
>
>
> Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael >
> wrote:
>
>> The scheduler logic
>>
>
>
> Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 6:48:31 PM UTC+8, Pertti Kellomäki wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tapir >wrote:
>>
>> $5 per day for 2000 users? and it is cost effective? Really!!!
>>
>
> You really need to look up the law of Diminishing Returns <
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimini
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tapir wrote:
>
> $5 per day for 2000 users? and it is cost effective? Really!!!
>
You really need to look up the law of Diminishing Returns <
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns>.
If you are worried about a cost that is less than you daily lunch, the
Hi,
Looks like there's connectivity issue to a variety of Google services,
including App Engine.
Output of traceroute:
$ traceroute ghs.google.com
traceroute to ghs.l.google.com (74.125.29.121), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 pavlov.gateway.pavlov.gateway (192.168.19.1) 1.444 ms 1.662 ms
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 2:04:44 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Rafael >
> wrote:
>
>> The scheduler logic
>>
>
>
> Regarding the scheduler, this is my favorite thread regarding the subject:
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/sA3o-PTAckc/T2
11 matches
Mail list logo
