No one has any update on this???
Thanks
Patrizio Munzi wrote:
Mmm,
I think there's need of datanucleus experts.
Hope someone could clarify this subject
wada3 wrote:
It would be bug or limitation of development environment.
I have not met them on real appengine environme
Mmm,
I think there's need of datanucleus experts.
Hope someone could clarify this subject
wada3 wrote:
It would be bug or limitation of development environment.
I have not met them on real appengine environment because
container looks like running on single thread model.
Normally it would
It would be bug or limitation of development environment.
I have not met them on real appengine environment because
container looks like running on single thread model.
Normally it would not need to be synchronized I think.
On Sep 11, 4:41 pm, "patrizio.munzi" wrote:
> Isn't this an important su
Isn't this an important subject to address?
Are all method calling the makePersistent method needed to be
synchronized...??
Is this a bug..??
No one has any consideration???
Thanks
On Sep 10, 10:35 am, "patrizio.munzi" wrote:
> I did a few more investigation and It looks like a threads safety
I did a few more investigation and It looks like a threads safety
problem.
In fact if I synchronize the method
com.myapp.server.datastore.EventsManager.addEvent whithin
makePersistent is called everything works fine.
I think here experts are needed..
:-)
Bye
On Sep 10, 10:18 am, "patrizio.munzi
