Yup - using Firefox. No warnings came up. I grabbed the XPCOM plugin from
the oophm branch & it installed on both FF3.1 & FF3.0. The one in the
firefox directory only installed in FF3.0.
On Windows though, the browser & JVM are still 32-bit - is this still
unsupported? Is x64 Linux supported
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote:
> I've been using Vista x64. I'll try it out on Linux x64 once I get the
> chance - I have to get some other stuff done before Monday.
I don't believe the plugin has been built for Windows x86_64 in the branch
(I built it XPCOM Windows x86_6
I've been using Vista x64. I'll try it out on Linux x64 once I get the
chance - I have to get some other stuff done before Monday.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:40 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote:
>
>> Wait - I'm confused. I am running with trunk & I'v
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote:
> Wait - I'm confused. I am running with trunk & I've been unable to get
> OOPHM working.
I am sure it is something simple as many people, both internally and
externally, are successfully using it. When I write up the detailed
instructions
Wait - I'm confused. I am running with trunk & I've been unable to get
OOPHM working. Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:50 AM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allahbaksh Asadullah <
> a.allahba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I see lot
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allahbaksh Asadullah wrote:
> I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I see lot of productivity
> improvement by that. But I am scared when I will move GWT 1.6 then I have to
> again go back to the Hosted Mode browser. Can't we have very basic
> functionality av
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Sami Jaber wrote:
> I think it could really (really) be interesting to get OOPHM with 1.6, is
> it so much work John (why not using a generator for the overlay classes,
> Sanjiv seems to use this kind of tool for SmartGWT) ?
>
> I don't know about SmartGWT, but bas
Recompiling a project using the build #4955 from SVN throws a lot of
errors, every time I use the RootPanel.get(“id_element”)… I get the
next exception:
at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.RootPanel.detachOnWindowClose
(RootPanel.java:122)
at com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.RootPanel.g
Hi,
I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I see lot of productivity
improvement by that. But I am scared when I will move GWT 1.6 then I have to
again go back to the Hosted Mode browser. Can't we have very basic
functionality available for GWT 1.6. Let it be in trunk so that people
interested
Hey Freeland,
I hacked on SvnInfo a bit to do the following things:
1) If .svn/ isn't present but .git/ is, use "git svn info".
2) A more surefire way of figuring out exactly what branch we're on. Note
the behavior change for a release branch: whereas before you'd get "1...@"
you'll now get
I think it could really (really) be interesting to get OOPHM with 1.6, is it
so much work John (why not using a generator for the overlay classes, Sanjiv
seems to use this kind of tool for SmartGWT) ?
I was using OOPHM as a early adopter since the beginning and with the
incompatibilities between O
11 matches
Mail list logo
