[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5085 - Exclude non-client ClientBundle code from apichecker.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 23:20:12 2009 New Revision: 5085 Modified: trunk/tools/api-checker/config/gwt15_16userApi.conf Log: Exclude non-client ClientBundle code from apichecker. Patch by: bobv Review by: amitmanjhi (TBR) Modified: trunk/tools/api-checker/config/gwt15_16us

[gwt-contrib] OOPHM HostedMode not compatible with FF3.1?

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
I just tested the XPCOM plugin in FF3.1 & got the following on startup: 00:00:21.687 [WARN] JSNI method '__defineStatic' returned a value of type boolean but was declared void; it should not have returned a value at all 00:00:21.891 [WARN] JSNI method '@com.google.gwt.dom.client.Style::setProperty

[gwt-contrib] Comment on ManagingMerges in google-web-toolkit

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by sco...@google.com: Google Code's svn is version 1.5 now, so we're looking at switching to using the automatic merge tracking features. For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ManagingMerges --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http:/

[gwt-contrib] Re: OOPHM plugin missing in FF and not working IE

2009-03-25 Thread John Tamplin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Allahbaksh Asadullah < a.allahba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Now coming to IE I have attached the error description in image which is > attached. Please note I don't get a new Tab in Hosted Mode Jetty Server > window when I open the application in IE. But when I use I

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread Ray Cromwell
Is this a method that exists, or a proposed one? Yeah, something like that would work, although you typically want to injectBefore an element, either a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread BobV
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote: > Awesome. With regards to StyleInjector, one feature I'd ask for is the > ability to control where in the cascade it injects. For example, I use IRB > in Chronoscope to inject GWT widget Themes, but what happens is, this > overrides any themes

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread Ray Cromwell
Awesome. With regards to StyleInjector, one feature I'd ask for is the ability to control where in the cascade it injects. For example, I use IRB in Chronoscope to inject GWT widget Themes, but what happens is, this overrides any themes the user has included via

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
+w00t! Congrats, Bob! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Why not move FastTree to GWT Trunk

2009-03-25 Thread Allahbaksh Asadullah
Hi,As we are aware the present tree in GWT project is not as efficient as the one in GWT-Incubator. So why not move that to the common distribution. Are we expecting few more changes in the FastTree in future? I think Set Object and Get Object method is the only thing which is needed as of now. R

[gwt-contrib] Re: Getting oophm working

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
2009/3/25 John Tamplin > What version of eclipse are you using? I only see this when I make > structural changes to a class. > That might be it. Eclipse 3.5 & Eclipse 3.4. I'll watch out for the kind of change I make when this happens. > j...@google.com (from Android) > > On Mar 25, 2009 8:1

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread Bruce Johnson
This stuff sucks. Revert it. Just kidding. wt! On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:31 PM, BobV wrote: > After 16+ months of on-and-off development, ClientBundle (nee > ImmutableResourceBundle) is moving to GWT trunk. > > $ find user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/

[gwt-contrib] Adding ClientBundle to trunk

2009-03-25 Thread BobV
After 16+ months of on-and-off development, ClientBundle (nee ImmutableResourceBundle) is moving to GWT trunk. $ find user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/ user/test/com/google/gwt/resources/ -name *.java | xargs wc | grep total 9871 34391 317990 total The com.google.gwt.resources.Resources

[gwt-contrib] Re: OOPHM plugin missing in FF and not working IE

2009-03-25 Thread Allahbaksh Asadullah
Hi,My Firefox plugin is working fine. I think I had previous version of plugin and that is the reason it had some problem. Now coming to IE I have attached the error description in image which is attached. Please note I don't get a new Tab in Hosted Mode Jetty Server window when I open the applica

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5084 - Edited wiki page through web user interface.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 19:13:22 2009 New Revision: 5084 Modified: wiki/ClientBundle.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/ClientBundle.wiki == --- wiki/ClientBundle.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5083 - Initial add of ClientBundle.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 19:12:25 2009 New Revision: 5083 Added: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/ (props changed) - copied from r5074, /changes/bobv/clientbundle/user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/ trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/rebind/StringSourceWri

[gwt-contrib] Re: Getting oophm working

2009-03-25 Thread John Tamplin
What version of eclipse are you using? I only see this when I make structural changes to a class. j...@google.com (from Android) On Mar 25, 2009 8:13 PM, "Vitali Lovich" wrote: > What IDE are you using? I know there are issues with hot-swap between JDT and Javac, so if you ar... I'm seeing t

[gwt-contrib] Re: Getting oophm working

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
> What IDE are you using? I know there are issues with hot-swap between JDT > and Javac, so if you aren't using Eclipse you may have some hot-swap issues > (Eclipse and GWT both use JDT), which allows you to change some classes > without doing a refresh. That is independent of a refresh, which is

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Scott Blum wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote: > >> If I don't put the log4j file into my WEB-INF/lib directory, then it's >> fine. If it is put there, then it gets the conflicting version (regardless >> of whether or not I launch Host

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote: > If I don't put the log4j file into my WEB-INF/lib directory, then it's > fine. If it is put there, then it gets the conflicting version (regardless > of whether or not I launch HostedMode with log4j on the class path). So am > I doing it w

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
I think I found the problem. If I don't put the log4j file into my WEB-INF/lib directory, then it's fine. If it is put there, then it gets the conflicting version (regardless of whether or not I launch HostedMode with log4j on the class path). So am I doing it wrong? Am I supposed to place it e

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
Hmm, but GWT doesn't use log4j internally. Is it possible you've got conflicting versions, one on the system classpath and one in your war directory? On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote: > og4j:ERROR A "org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender" object is not assignable to > a "org.apac

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5082 - Providing debug-useful implementation of toString and toSource.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: fabb...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 14:01:24 2009 New Revision: 5082 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/JavaScriptObject.java Log: Providing debug-useful implementation of toString and toSource. Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/core/client/JavaScriptObject.ja

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
og4j:ERROR A "org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender" object is not assignable to a "org.apache.log4j.Appender" variable. log4j:ERROR The class "org.apache.log4j.Appender" was loaded by log4j:ERROR [sun.misc.launcher$appclassloa...@64601bb1] whereas object of type log4j:ERROR "org.apache.log4j.ConsoleApp

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
Vitali, can you remind me what your issue is? On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote: > This didn't fix my log4j issue, but there's a workaround: > > adding -Dlog4j.ignoreTCL to the VM arguments fixes it. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Toby Reyelts wrote: > >> Overall, the c

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
Thanks for the feedback, Toby. As Toby said, this code is less than clear-cut, and I don't feel totally comfortable about it. But I think the best decision is to mirror Jetty's behavior as closely as possible, because it's likely to be the least surprising. In other words, lots of people have use

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Vitali Lovich
This didn't fix my log4j issue, but there's a workaround: adding -Dlog4j.ignoreTCL to the VM arguments fixes it. On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Toby Reyelts wrote: > Overall, the change to treat server classes vs system classes separately, > such that system classes are "API classes" and serv

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5080 - Removes the PermutationWorkerFactory.lazyFactories cache.

2009-03-25 Thread Scott Blum
Thanks! On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:48 PM, BobV wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM, wrote: > > > > Author: sco...@google.com > > Date: Wed Mar 25 11:12:37 2009 > > New Revision: 5080 > > > > Modified: > >trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/PermutationWorkerFactory.java > > > > Log

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread Toby Reyelts
Overall, the change to treat server classes vs system classes separately, such that system classes are "API classes" and server classes are "implementation classes" looks good. I'm concerned that there will still be places where things will clash - such as the sharing of log4j across both server a

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r5080 - Removes the PermutationWorkerFactory.lazyFactories cache.

2009-03-25 Thread BobV
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM, wrote: > > Author: sco...@google.com > Date: Wed Mar 25 11:12:37 2009 > New Revision: 5080 > > Modified: >    trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/PermutationWorkerFactory.java > > Log: > Removes the PermutationWorkerFactory.lazyFactories cache. LGTM -- Bob

[gwt-contrib] Re: OOPHM plugin missing in FF and not working IE

2009-03-25 Thread John Tamplin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Allahbaksh Asadullah < a.allahba...@gmail.com> wrote: > I downloaded the latest plugin for FF and IE and built the source from > SVN. In IE after installing the plugin my page doesnot appear only. > There will be some error and and after that nothing works. > What

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5081 - Using an outDir should not be the default; making the default to use -war war.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 11:37:18 2009 New Revision: 5081 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/ArgHandlerOutDirDeprecated.java Log: Using an outDir should not be the default; making the default to use -war war. Review by: spoon (desk) Modified: trunk/dev/co

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5080 - Removes the PermutationWorkerFactory.lazyFactories cache.

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 11:12:37 2009 New Revision: 5080 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/PermutationWorkerFactory.java Log: Removes the PermutationWorkerFactory.lazyFactories cache. The problem with caching these as static state is that the Factories the

[gwt-contrib] OOPHM plugin missing in FF and not working IE

2009-03-25 Thread Allahbaksh Asadullah
Hi, I downloaded the latest plugin for FF and IE and built the source from SVN. In IE after installing the plugin my page doesnot appear only. There will be some error and and after that nothing works. When I open the same in FF with View IN IE plugin installed it works fine. In FF it stills thr

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5079 - Adjusts the script-size logging from r5076 to happen at

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sp...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 08:33:27 2009 New Revision: 5079 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Link.java Log: Adjusts the script-size logging from r5076 to happen at log level TRACE rather than DEBUG. Suggested by: jat Review by: spoon Modified: trunk/dev/core/

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR: logging script size for programs with code splitting

2009-03-25 Thread Lex Spoon
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:57 PM, John Tamplin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Lex Spoon wrote: >> >> I left it at DEBUG, only for the following reason: the intention is >> that people can pick this script size out of their continuous builds. >> They'll need to run at level DEBUG to do

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5078 - Amending r5077:

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 05:43:19 2009 New Revision: 5078 Modified: releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/jetty/JettyLauncher.java Log: Amending r5077: - Catch ClassNotFound in outside loader and allow internal load - Allow "system" resources to be loaded int

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5077 - Ensure that system classes are always loaded from the external classloader and never copi...

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Wed Mar 25 05:31:10 2009 New Revision: 5077 Modified: releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/jetty/JettyLauncher.java Log: Ensure that system classes are always loaded from the external classloader and never copied into the WebAppClassLoader.

[gwt-contrib] Comment on RpcAuth in google-web-toolkit

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by thobias.karlsson: We've just extracted old GWTEXT lib from our GWT 1.4 application, and we are finally able to upgrade to GWT 1.5/1.6. In 1.4 we solved the XSRF problem by implementing a secure service interface proxy generator. Since the HTTPRequest class is now deprecated, we h

[gwt-contrib] Comment on RpcAuth in google-web-toolkit

2009-03-25 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment by thobias.karlsson: When is this supposed to go live? ...or at least as beta? For more information: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RpcAuth --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~-