Re: Incorrect mailto: links for list replies.
> I agree, and David pointed it out originally. Are you implicitly saying > it shouldn't and won't? I'm uncomfortable with the idea of mucking with the subject line, for several reasons (parsing chanllenges, unclear etiquette, internationalization, ...) I would feel a more comfortable if the practice was well codified in an RFC. Is it? Using the In-Reply-To in mailto seems cleaner for the stated problem, so feel free to lobby your favorite mail user agent vendors for support. -Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
Re: Incorrect mailto: links for list replies.
Hi Jeff, > > When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " [...] > > The Mail Archive doesn't add any prefixing. I agree, and David pointed it out originally. Are you implicitly saying it shouldn't and won't? Cheers, Ralph. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
Re: Incorrect mailto: links for list replies.
> When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " [...] The Mail Archive doesn't add any prefixing. So I've tried a few more systems (mostly Apple) and none of them are working. That means either I screwed up, or mail user agents don't support this feature, or both. Can a few volunteers use the reply button at the bottom of the web page? Please mention your browser/operating-system/mail-user-agent. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01392.html Thanks, Jeff -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
Re: Incorrect mailto: links for list replies.
Hi Jeff, > Based on David's request, I've put together preliminary support for > In-Reply-To to help with threading. When you add prefixing the subject with "Re: " can you strip off any existing chain of Re and FW first, e.g. s/^(?:(?:re|fw):\s*)*/Re: /i Cheers, Ralph. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
