[gmx-users] High pressure in coarse-grained parametrization

2018-04-06 Thread Alex
Dear all, Here is a part of the *.mdp file I am using in coarse-grained parametrization (Iterative Boltzmann Inversion method) of a molecule by votca. integrator = sd tinit= 0 dt = 0.2 nsteps = 5000 init_step

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Borchert, Christopher B ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor
Unfortunately using your shortened cmake args, I still get fpic errors. But it does complete the build statically with -DGMX_BUILD_SHARED_EXE=OFF CC=cc CXX=CC cmake ../ -DGMX_SIMD=AVX2_256 -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_GPU=ON -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=${FFTW_DIR}/.. /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/libgromacs.dir/mdlib

[gmx-users] GROMACS 2018 MDRun: Multiple Ranks/GPU Issue

2018-04-06 Thread Hollingsworth, Bobby
Hello all, I'm tuning MDrun on a node with 24 intel skylake cores (2X12) and 2 V100 GPUs. MPI-enabled (no thread-mpi) Gromacs 2018 ("2018.0") is compiled with GCC, CUDA, OpenMPI, and OpenBLAS. I am trying to assign the two GPUs to four ranks. My run command is: mpirun -np 4 mdrun_mpi_s_g -ntomp 6

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
On CSCS Piz Daint I use the following command line (assuming PrgEnv-gnu) where everything in "[]" is optional and compilation should work just fine without. CC=cc CXX=CC cmake ../ -DGMX_SIMD=THE_RIGHT_SIMD_FLAVOR -DGMX_MPI=ON -DGMX_GPU=ON -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=${FFTW_DIR}/.. \ [ -DGMX_FFT_LIBRARY=ff

[gmx-users] gmx select and gmx trjconv or gmx density

2018-04-06 Thread Dan Gil
Hi, I am trying to select particles that are z < 20 and z > 10 as a function of time. I think I used gmx select correctly and generated an index file with group names like "(z_<_.8_f2882_t23056.000)" Now I am unsure how I use this index file for gmx trjconv or gmx density. Does anybody have some

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Borchert, Christopher B ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor
You are trying to give me a hint. :) My cmake args are taken from a co-worker, and the statement syntax is from the CMakeCache.txt file. On a Cray you force cc/CC and all the module libraries/headers should be automatically found. Strangely it didn’t find fftw without help. Regardless I get the

[gmx-users] using constant velocities during simulation

2018-04-06 Thread Qasim Pars
Dear users, I would like to use the constant velocities for all the atoms of both protein and ligand during all the simulation steps (EM, NVT, NPT and MD). Do you know how I can do that with GROMACS? In this case, the COM, the linear momentum and angular momentum of both groups wouldn't change

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
FYI: not even a my vanilla (non-CRAY) local build which does work otherwise succeeds with cmake . -DCUDA_NVCC_FLAGS:STRING="-rdc=true" so as I guessed, that's the culprit. Out of curiosity I wonder: what's the reason for the "inventive" use of CMake options, none of which are needed? -- Szilárd

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
I think the fpic errors can't be caused by missing rdc=true because the latter refers to the GPU _device_ code, but GROMACS does not need relocatable device code, so that should not be necessary. -- Szilárd On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Borchert, Christopher B ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor wrote:

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Borchert, Christopher B ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor
Thanks Szilárd. My understanding is rdc is nvcc's equivalent of fpic. I get fpic errors without it. In fact I get fpic errors without including fpic explicitly in the C/CXX flags. /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/libgromacs.dir/mdlib/nbnxn_cuda/libgromacs_generated_nbnxn_cuda.cu.o: relocation R_X86_64_

Re: [gmx-users] chain separator issue for the "gmx do_dssp": do NOT need to provide a "ss.map" file

2018-04-06 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Also, can the "map file format" page be updated with "chain separator"? http://manual.gromacs.org/online/map.html 9 ~ Coil 1 1 1 E B-Sheet 1 0 0 B B-Bridge 0 0 0

Re: [gmx-users] Number of Xeon cores per GTX 1080Ti

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
I went on to refresh my memory a bit and I thought I'd share a summary for those curious. The actual clocks CPU will be running at are determined by a number of factors: base and boost clocks (by spec), actual boost clocks achievable (depending on cores used, workload, TDP) and this is not hugely

[gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread ABEL Stephane
I know the paper but the webpage Thanks you Viveca -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:45:45 +0200 From: Viveca Lindahl To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Cc: "gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se" Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS w

Re: [gmx-users] Problem with CUDA

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
Hi, What is the reason for using the custom CMake options? What's the -rdc=true for -- I don't think it's needed and it can very well be causing the issue. Have you tried to actually do an as-vanilla-as-possible build? -- Szilárd On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Borchert, Christopher B ERDC-RDE-

Re: [gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread Viveca Lindahl
Hi, There is this ancient gromacs page which I guess you already found: http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Removing_fastest_degrees_of_freedom Here are a couple of references, the second for using virtual sites for CHARMM lipids: Bjelkmar, P., Larsson, P., Cuendet, M. A., Hess, B. & Li

[gmx-users] chain separator issue for the "gmx do_dssp": do NOT need to provide a "ss.map" file

2018-04-06 Thread ZHANG Cheng
I would like to share my answer for chain separator issue for the "gmx do_dssp". Millions of thanks to Carsten! The "gmx do_dssp" will output an additional line as chain separator between two chains. We do NOT need to provide a "ss.map" file in our working directory, and the command will find

Re: [gmx-users] How to search answers for previous posts?

2018-04-06 Thread Szilárd Páll
Use google the "site:" keyword is ideal for that. -- Szilárd On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:51 PM, ZHANG Cheng <272699...@qq.com> wrote: > Dear Gromacs, > I know I can see all the post from > https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/ > > > but can I search from this link? I do not w

[gmx-users] How to search answers for previous posts?

2018-04-06 Thread ZHANG Cheng
Dear Gromacs, I know I can see all the post from https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/ but can I search from this link? I do not want to download all of them to my PC. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http

Re: [gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread Anthony Nash
Hi Stephane, I hope it is useful. I am afraid I have very little charmm experience. I used the approach posted for an amber ff. I hope someone can help with the charmm aspect. Kind regards Anthony Nash PhD MRSC Department of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics University of Oxford

[gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread ABEL Stephane
Many thanks Anthony I will read your post blog. I have another quick question: Does the approach work by defaults (w/o modifications) for other biomolecules such as surfactants or it is necessary to construct a virtual site table as we can found for protein in the charmm*.ff distribution ? St

Re: [gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread Anthony Nash
Hi, I tried something like this about a year ago and I put an instructional blog post together. Warning: it was pulled together from a paper I found and not my own efforts although I did get it to work. Any questions I might not be able to respond, I'm on vacation! https://distributedscience.

[gmx-users] Speed up simulations with GROMACS with virtual interaction sites

2018-04-06 Thread ABEL Stephane
Hi gmx users, I know that it is possible to speed up the simulations by a factor 2 (by using a larger timestep) in GROMACS with virtual interaction sites. By I do not find a clear procedure on the web in particular if I use CHARMM. Do you have any pointers or procedures and examples of mdp fi