On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:11:55 -0600
IgnorantGuru wrote:
> Greetings. Not sure where is the best place to bring this - input
> welcome - but this email is an official complaint against the conduct
> of:
I haven't had the pleasure to converse with Andre Klapper, but I
can attest to the predispositi
I'd just like to thank everyone for their input. I'll be unsubscribing from
these lists shortly - I'm not a regular subscriber - so please feel free to
comment on my blog or CC me. Also, for those curious about my blog, it is not
revenue generating, it's just a developer's blog that receives o
Right. What happens seems to be that because the Red Hat (or people
working closely with them) are the main developers in gtk+, and they mainly
work on GNOME, they naturally look at the needs of GNOME as the main driver
for their work. It is hard to say they intentionally work against
non-GNOME e
Dude, seriously.
There is no conspiracy. Red Hat is not an evil empire.
If you have a problem, spit it out already. Otherwise, ranting about how
Red Hat is taking over the world!!1! is not doing anyone a favour.
You've made your point. It would appear that people are not really in
agreement with
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 23:34:44 +0200
Gergely Polonkai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I didn’t really want you to believe me, I just shared my experiences,
> that’s all. I got help several times from these “Red Hat employees”
> before, although I wouldn’t say it came in an instant; I must confess
> that someti
Hello,
I didn’t really want you to believe me, I just shared my experiences,
that’s all. I got help several times from these “Red Hat employees” before,
although I wouldn’t say it came in an instant; I must confess that
sometimes I bugged them or IRC before they answered my calls. The keywords
her
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 21:53:24 +0200
Gergely Polonkai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m sorry to say that, but I find your name very appropriate in this
> case: *Ignorant* Guru. You seem to ignore every statement that says
> something else that you do.
>
> GNOME is not a Red Hat product. It is a GNOME Found
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 21:17:15 +0200
John Tall wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:59 PM, IgnorantGuru
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 19:25:56 +0200
> > John Tall wrote:
> >
> >> GTK+ is not a Red Hat project.
> >
> > Another good example here is this very complaint. A real free
> > project would
Hello,
I’m sorry to say that, but I find your name very appropriate in this case:
*Ignorant* Guru. You seem to ignore every statement that says something
else that you do.
GNOME is not a Red Hat product. It is a GNOME Foundation product, if you
want to put it anywhere. It is led by several develo
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 21:20:52 +0200 (CEST)
Lucas Levrel wrote:
> Le 7 juin 2015, IgnorantGuru a écrit :
>
> > As for who agrees with me and who doesn't, outside of fanboy lists
> > and such, most people I encounter are QUITE unhappy with GTK 3, and
> > often ask why I use it at all.
>
> Indeed, c
Le 7 juin 2015, IgnorantGuru a écrit :
As for who agrees with me and who doesn't, outside of fanboy lists and
such, most people I encounter are QUITE unhappy with GTK 3, and often
ask why I use it at all.
Indeed, can't you go back and use GTK 2 instead ? (Maybe does this bug
exist in GTK2 as
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 8:59 PM, IgnorantGuru
wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 19:25:56 +0200
> John Tall wrote:
>
>> GTK+ is not a Red Hat project.
>
> Another good example here is this very complaint. A real free project would
> have developers who are held accountable for their actions. One reaso
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 19:25:56 +0200
John Tall wrote:
> GTK+ is not a Red Hat project.
Another good example here is this very complaint. A real free project would
have developers who are held accountable for their actions. One reason I sent
this complaint to this list is because there's simply
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 19:25:56 +0200
John Tall wrote:
> And you want the GNOME developers to support all of them?
I want GTK+ developers to stick to GUI development with minimal dependencies,
and certainly no DE-specific dependencies, and not engage the entire Red Hat
stack in the GUI, as they've
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 6:08 PM, IgnorantGuru
wrote:
> It’s not a question of whether I personally want to use systemd or
> gvfs or Red Hat's tools, or even what conspiracies that
> billion-dollar corporation may be involved with. But as an
> independent FM developer using GTK as my GUI, I want my
It’s not a question of whether I personally want to use systemd or gvfs or Red
Hat's tools, or even what conspiracies that billion-dollar corporation may be
involved with. But as an independent FM developer using GTK as my GUI, I want
my software to be able to run on a wide variety of systems,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:11 PM, IgnorantGuru
wrote:
> Greetings. Not sure where is the best place to bring this - input
> welcome - but this email is an official complaint against the conduct
> of:
>
> Matthias Clasen
> Emmanuele Bassi
> André Klapper
I read the entire thread and what I saw was
On 06/04/2015 01:11 PM, IgnorantGuru wrote:
> All that needs to be done to fix it is add the traditional
> location used for fuse mounts to the heuristics - a 5 minute job.
Have you submitted a patch then? I have a hard time seeing how any of
the devs would refuse a well-written patch that fixes
Greetings. Not sure where is the best place to bring this - input
welcome - but this email is an official complaint against the conduct
of:
Matthias Clasen
Emmanuele Bassi
André Klapper
Specially, their conduct administering the GTK+ bugtracker in the case
of bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_
19 matches
Mail list logo