2009/11/4 Sven Herzberg :
> In my opinion the GTK+ way is really nice (just compare it to GStreamers
> element factory, which behaves essentially the same way, just as
> GnomeCanvas' gnome_canvas_item_new() function). It's really nice to get
> those items returned as the generic type (but Cody told
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> I've attached a patch for easy reference.
>
> I suggest you open an enhancement request for this at bugzilla.gnome.org
> and attach your patch there.
Sure thing:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577231
Thanks,
-Andrew
_
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> I checked gvalue.h and I don't see a #define in there containing the
> proper initializer list for a GValue to prevent gcc warnings. Rather
> than duplicating "GValue v = {0, {{0}}};" everywhere, I'd lik
When a GValue is declared on the stack, the large code base I work
with usually does not properly initialize the struct. (e.g. "GValue v
= {0,};") This causes gcc to print warnings when 'gcc -Wall -Wextra'
is used due to -Wmissing-braces and -Wmissing-field-initializers.
I checked gvalue.h and I d
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> Would you please file this as enhancement request against GObject?
>
> An attached patch that follows the coding style nicely plus some
> code to test the feature in gobject/tests will increase the
> probability of this becoming committed s
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> But I don't disagree that NaN or +/- inf should be allowed, assuming
> a restriction such as the above isn't in place for the particular
> instance of GParamSpecDouble.
This brings up an interesting question.. if the GParamSpecDouble
mi
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>> Should I patch GParamSpecDouble to have two :1 fields for 'allow_nan',
>> 'allow_inf' and make param_double_validate do the correct thing with
>> isnan()/isinf()?
>
> I think you have a very good point here and that use case is entirely
>
I have a GObject with a double property that I need to be able to set
NaN to in certain circumstances. Right now, GObject prints out a
warning when this is done because param_double_validate does not
handle NaN/Inf explicitly.
** WARNING **: value "NaN" of type `gdouble' is invalid or out of
rang
I noticed that glib doesn't contain g_utf8_strchug, g_utf8_strchomp,
g_utf8_strstrip (macro), which would be UTF8 safe versions of the functions in
gstrfuncs.c.
Conveniently, these functions already exists in file-roller, which I found here:
http://tinyurl.com/6xpjv9
Can these be pulled down
Good to see others working on abstractions like this. We have a closed
system for internal use, but it was developed to do much of the same
by reimplementing/extending the GOB syntax and writing a new
"compiler" for it. Simultaneous code is output in both C/C++ with an
introspection system added fo
wanting to copy the GValue before calling object_set_property()?
Thanks,
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On 11/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest that somebody look at what the full requirements are,
> and not mimic Python. :-)
I agree. I suggest that the use/syntax of .NET's WaitHandle,
AutoResetEvent, ManualResetEvent be looked over. .NET/mono make this
concept ve
he attributes
themselves support attributes, so you can nest them indefinetely if you have a
situation that warrants it. (Just like in .NET) Many articles/books on .NET
attributes exist, but here is a good description if anyone is interested:
http://www.csharphelp.com/archives3/archive558.html
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
I have and submit the
patch. If this already exists in some form, let me know, thanks!
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
their chance to
right this particular issue.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 10:58 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > > The Solaris implementation has a problem with any fopen() which
> > >opens a file above the 256 file descriptor.
> >
> > I&#
to
do this? In my opinion, it just *feels* wrong... All over the documentation,
GObject is referred to as a "base" class, but that implies abstract to me
because the intention is for everyone to created subclassed types. Am I missing
something?
Andrew Paprocki
Bl
ted by ISO C90 and was
> not supported by GCC versions before GCC 3.0.
Yeah, just saw that now.. Now I consider the fact that -std=c89 does not
implicitly enable -Wdeclaration-after-statement a bug.. ;)
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
g
dantic -o g g.c
g.c: In function `main':
g.c:8: warning: ISO C89 forbids mixed declarations and code
This could have changed in newer GCC versions, but this is with 3.3.4.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-lis
5.6
As tested by the Perennial C Compiler Validation Suite.
http://www.peren.com/pages/cvsa.htm
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
are running Solaris 10 and IBM AIX 5L 5.3,
the OS will not have C99 compliant standard C libraries.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
VC++8.0 == visual studio .net 2005
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
ple), building with c99 requires a certain OS level and runtime
libraries be installed, breaking ABI.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>does this make? there is no reason why software from the year 2006
>needs to be compiled with compilers from the year 1986.
cc: Sun C 5.5 Patch 112760-09 2004/03/31
That does not look like a compiler from 1986 to me. I said we disable c99
features for internal reasons. When you are dealing with
I disagree with this completely. We compile all of our code on Solaris/AIX with
SunPRO cc & IBM xlc without c99 extensions enabled for our own reasons. Code can
take advantage of c99 features, but only if they can be abstracted out in
gmacros/config.h/etc.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomber
e above be considered as
a viable option if it was to wait entirely for 3.x?
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
ing
functionality?)
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
ed as to what they expect.
The only issue here as far as I'm concerned is how to best deal with the
GTK_OBJECT_SET_FLAGS macro problem. If I remember from the original discussion,
GtkObject can disappear completely in the next major GTK version, since all of
its functionality would n
object is not floating, and
ref_sink internally. So the user's code will look like:
object = fancy_not_gtk_object_new();
fancy_container_add(container, object);
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
h
floating behavior that is not dependent on GTK already
write their own wrappers, but there is no reason why the underlying object
framework should not support it natively, as this benefits all users who write
reusable gobject based APIs.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
- Original Message
Since we don't/can't use glibc, I wouldn't want to see this
functionality disappear if it were supported in glibc. :)
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
ntation if they felt it
was necessary to stay with the existing code. This is a nice feature in the
case of the regular gmem functions, so it would be nice to see something
similar for g_slice.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Morten We
this a possible
addition to 2.10 since it would change API behavior? Or has this never been done
because the impact was deemed to great versus the benefit?
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http
- Original Message -
From: Paul Leonerd Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At: 11/30 5:49
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:57:42 -0500
"ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GList * g_list_slice(GList *list, GList *link, gint n_links);
> GList * g_lis
uld
primarily be looking for remove_slice and splice calls that take ownership.
Comments?
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
the system implementation has an fd
limitation? The configure script could detect this and enable it if necessary.
Just wondering if anyone else had run into this problem...
Thanks,
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list
Can someone fill me in if there is proper documentation for the signals on
GtkNotebook? Specifically, these:
"change-current-page"
"focus-tab"
"select-page"
"switch-page"
If an application wishes to prevent the notebook from switching pages if some
type of validation fails on the current existi
jections, I ask that this be checked into glib CVS.
Thanks,
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
--- configure.in18 Nov 2005 14:01:59 - 1.474
+++ configure.in20 Nov 2005 21:11:56 -
@@ -700,6 +700,21 @@
}],[g_can_inline=yes],[g_can_inline=no])
AC_MSG_RESULT($g_can_inline)
resolution timer functions take ~3 cycles.
Compared to gettimeofday(), they are about 10x faster.
If no one has objections, I ask that this be checked into glib CVS.
Thanks,
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
--- configure.in18 Nov 2005 14:01:59 - 1.474
+++ configure.in20 Nov 2005 20
ck to 1998 to clear
this up.. :)
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
- Original Message -
From: Nickolay V. Shmyrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At: 11/20 8:26
Hi Andrew
Since this code is badly documented, you might want to look at annotated
CVS history on cvs.gnome.org
Here is the cha
with insufficient space? Are container implementations supposed
to do something special to handle this case?
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
to propose a patch after I
try to track down the explicit compiler version that had a prob. -Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At: 11/12 15:15
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:28:21PM +0100, Tim Janik wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, ANDREW PAPROCKI, B
l code, but does not mention any version numbers.
Next step, dig out the Perl src to see if they have an idea :)
Thanks,
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Dave,
Using the same container example which needs to take ownership of GObjects
passed to the public API --
The problem we have is that much more time and effort goes into crafting the
core container objects, and having inconsistent public API (two methods) to add
an object to a container is h
43 matches
Mail list logo
