Hmm we need to add below to info to the GVolume docs. So people dont
get confused :-)
Here is a patch:
> For your details, maybe we should also hide the /usr/local mountpoint...
Yep I agree on that.
/
Mikael
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 09:32 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2007
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 14:43 +0100, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
> I tried to figure out how the GIO's GVolume[Monitor] API works.
>
> It seems broken or maybe its HAL thats is buggy or maybe its me that is
> buggy and dont understand how it should work ;-)
>
> My mt
I tried to figure out how the GIO's GVolume[Monitor] API works.
It seems broken or maybe its HAL thats is buggy or maybe its me that is
buggy and dont understand how it should work ;-)
My mtab has this mountpoints: (unrelated "system /proc etc..." has been
removed)
/dev/sda7 / e
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:38 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:50 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > > So, Maybe a better set of names would be something like:
> > > GDrive <-1-n-> GVolume <-1-1-> GMount
> > >
> > > Othe
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:50 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > So, Maybe a better set of names would be something like:
> > GDrive <-1-n-> GVolume <-1-1-> GMount
> >
> > Other alternatives for GMount: GMountedVolume, GMounted, GMountPoint
> > Any other i
plementation for GVolumeMonitor
> > and have some suggestions making the volume monitor API better. First of
> > all it appears that the current GDrive and GVolume abstraction is more
> > or less a 1:1 copy of what was in GnomeVFS.
> >
> > There's a couple o
API better. First of
> > all it appears that the current GDrive and GVolume abstraction is more
> > or less a 1:1 copy of what was in GnomeVFS.
> >
> > There's a couple of problems with this approach. The main problem is
> > that GDrive doesn't really re
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 04:11 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've started working on writing a hal implementation for GVolumeMonitor
> and have some suggestions making the volume monitor API better. First of
> all it appears that the current GDrive and GVolume abstracti
