Re: [goops] adding a number class with generic methods

On 5/4/06, Marco Maggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Neil Jerram" wrote: >"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: >> I do not understand why the first solution does not work; >>I've tried different combinations of functions but there is >>something I am missing. >

Re: [goops] adding a number class with generic methods

"Neil Jerram" wrote: >"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: >> I do not understand why the first solution does not work; >>I've tried different combinations of functions but there is >>something I am missing. > > Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the ge

vector typing

Hi all, I'm upgrading an application from the old gh interface (yep, about time too, it's much nicer) and I've noticed a change in the way vectors are constructed in the api. I used to use gh_doubles2scm to quickly convert a block of data into a generalised vector. I've moved over to using scm_tak

Re: potential memory leak in do loop

Thanks Kevin and Paul, I am little bit rusty with Linux. I have not used it since my graduate studies ten years ago. I was not aware of the "top" command. I will monitor the process with it. Right now the memory usage seems fairly constant at 30Mb. If I need to use some kind of debuging pac

Re: [goops] adding a number class with generic methods

"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: >> I do not understand why the first solution does not work; >>I've tried different combinations of functions but there is >>something I am missing. > > Damn... it seems to work if I do not EXPORT the generic > methods. You