"Neil Jerram" wrote:
>My intuition is that the NAN? name should be used only
>for a procedure which takes a single number and reports
>whether it is NAN or not (as #t/#f).
Yes. The abstract behind having a NAN? for my custom
vectors and matrices is to let the user write math
functions that work fo
"Neil Jerram" wrote:
>Well, the following seems to work ...
>[...]
>In other words, it appears that the args of
>make-procedure-with-setter
>can be generics.
Yes! The following appears to do what I want:
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-class ()
(v #:init-keyword #:value))
(define-method (m
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not that I know of. I'll take a look at the code though.
Well, the following seems to work ...
(use-modules (oop goops))
(define-method (second (l )) (cadr l))
(define-method (set-second (l ) val) (set-car! (cdr l) val))
(define-method (second (l )) (ve
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Neil Jerram" wrote:
>>"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Example: I have two predicates HIT-NAN? and MAP-NAN?
>>> which one it is better to call NAN?
>>
>>I'm afraid I don't understand. Perhaps you could write
>>the down for the two possib
"Marco Maggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So a working example is:
>
> ;;
>
> (use-modules (oop goops))
>
> (debug-enable 'debug)
> (debug-enable 'backtrace)
> (debug-enable 'trace)
>
>
> (define-class ()
> (v #:init-keyword #:value))
>
> (define elm (
