Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug?

2012-04-24 Thread Noah Lavine
>> > Oh, another one; each procedure call of the same level is legal on other >> > language like Chicken? I'm confused. >> >> Yes, I think this should be legal in all Scheme implementations, >> including Guile and Chicken. > > > Very confused; I saw many compile errors and it disappeared after > re

Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug?

2012-04-24 Thread Sunjoong Lee
It's very pleasure to know something new. 2012/4/25 Noah Lavine > > Yes, that's right. And procedures at one level can always call to > procedures at a higher level, but not the other way around. I understood. > > I have another question; What if the macro case? > > Suppose there is a proced

Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug?

2012-04-24 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, > I see. You mean the procedures of the same level can call each other. Right? Yes, that's right. And procedures at one level can always call to procedures at a higher level, but not the other way around. > I have another question; What if the macro case? > Suppose there is a procedure to

Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug?

2012-04-24 Thread Sunjoong Lee
Thanks Noah. 2012/4/25 Noah Lavine > Hello, > > That's actually perfectly legal. The procedure definitions at the top > level of a module can all call each other. > > (This also applies to all of the procedures inside a 'let' or similar.) I see. You mean the procedures of the same level can ca

Re: read-header procedure of (web http) module has a bug?

2012-04-24 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, That's actually perfectly legal. The procedure definitions at the top level of a module can all call each other. (This also applies to all of the procedures inside a 'let' or similar.) Noah On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Sunjoong Lee wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder I found a bug; > read-