() Mike Gran
() Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Do you have a personal philosophy on how much you try to
minimize the scope of procedures?
I figure out the data structures first, then use procedures w/o
overmuch regard to inner/outer. However, i...
If you were writing a tutorial,
Mike Gran writes:
> I've been looking over one of the solutions to a Guile 100 problem
> (a basic version of the `ls' command) at the link below. It is
> interesting stylistically because it works very hard at minimizing the
> scope of procedures. It uses a lot of procedures within procedures,
I often write things the way you do. I find that it's easier to test if I
can get at as many procedures as possible from the REPL (but maybe I'm not
very Schemey either). I also find it harder to read procedures declared in
let blocks sometimes because they make the flow of control jump around on
t
I've been looking over one of the solutions to a Guile 100 problem
(a basic version of the `ls' command) at the link below. It is
interesting stylistically because it works very hard at minimizing the
scope of procedures. It uses a lot of procedures within procedures,
like, for example, within a
