I wrote:
> I can think of one notable case where the program would know where
> libguile is located: when the program bundles its own copy of Guile, and
> therefore assumes that libguile and the program are always moved
> together as an atomic unit.
>
> This practice is frowned upon on most POSIX
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:24:17 -0400
>> From:
>> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>>
>> On windows, I think you call GetModuleFileName() with the handle that was
>> passed to DllMain().
>> Is it possible for libguile to do that?
>
> I see no reasons why not.
Yes, that much we
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:24:17 -0400
> From:
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>
> On windows, I think you call GetModuleFileName() with the handle that was
> passed to DllMain().
> Is it possible for libguile to do that?
I see no reasons why not.
> Seems like most windows apps install everything i
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:42:27 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> >> From: Mark H Weaver
> >> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:56:53 -0400
> >>
> >> Remember that Guile is
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:59:03 +0200
>
> > Why should this feature be limited to Windows builds of Guile? Why
> > not make it work for Posix platforms as well? Some other projects
> > already do, they use argv[0] and PATH search to find the place where
>
Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> >> From: Mark H Weaver
> >> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:56:53 -0400
> >>
> >> Remember that Guile is a library, not just an executable. So argv[0]
> >> could point to any arbitrary execu
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:56:53 -0400
>>
>> Remember that Guile is a library, not just an executable. So argv[0]
>> could point to any arbitrary executable that's linked with libguile.
>
> We can
Hi all,
This small discussion refers to the current head of the guile-log
branch. When the parser framework is rich enough I will issue a new
release of it.
As you know I'm currently working with guile-log to attach decent
parser tools in for anyone wanting to do parsing in a logic
programming e
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>
>>> From: Mark H Weaver
>>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "guile-user\@gnu.org"
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:13:19 -0400
>>>
>>> Of course, ideally we would allow the entire Guile install to be freely
>>> relocatable, as Windows us
Hi Eli,
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>>
>> > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you?
>> > If not, I suggest to try that, my impre
Eli Zaretskii skribis:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "guile-user\@gnu.org"
>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:13:19 -0400
>>
>> Of course, ideally we would allow the entire Guile install to be freely
>> relocatable, as Windows users have come to expect. This would require
>> some h
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:33:51 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
>
> > From: Mark H Weaver
> > Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:56:53 -0400
> >
> > Remember that Guile is a library, not just an executable. So argv[0]
> > could
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:56:53 -0400
>
> Remember that Guile is a library, not just an executable. So argv[0]
> could point to any arbitrary executable that's linked with libguile.
We can provide an API for passing to th
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: godek.mac...@gmail.com, guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:50:34 -0400
>
> Well, that's not generally how things are done on POSIX systems
As I said, some GNU projects already do that. GCC and GDB are two
examples.
> furthermore I don't see how this cou
Alexandru Cojocaru writes:
> `eq?' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
> comparison)
> `eqv?' extends `eq?' to look at the value of numbers and
> characters.
>
> this is what I get:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
> $1 = #t
>
> is this behavior intention
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
>>> From: Mark H Weaver
>>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "guile-user\@gnu.org"
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:13:19 -0400
>>>
>>> Of course, ideally we would allow the entire Guile install to be freely
>>> relocatable, as Windows users have come to
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "guile-user\@gnu.org"
>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:13:19 -0400
>>
>> Of course, ideally we would allow the entire Guile install to be freely
>> relocatable, as Windows users have come to expect. This would require
>> some he
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>>
>> > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you?
>> > If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is t
m...@markwitmer.com writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Here's what happens on my Debian wheezy system, starting from a pristine
>> git checkout (using "git clean -dxf"):
>> ...
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure #> ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: no c
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Here's what happens on my Debian wheezy system, starting from a pristine
> git checkout (using "git clean -dxf"):
> ...
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: In procedure # ice-9/boot-9.scm:97:6 (thrown-k . args)>:
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:106:20: no code for module (xcb xml)
> make: *** [
mark.d.wit...@gmail.com writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> * Although the README says that Guile 2.0.9 is required, the configure
>> script will accept nothing less than Guile 2.2. Since 2.2 does not
>> exist yet, it would be good to accept Guile 2.0 in the meantime :)
>
> Yes, that's a mi
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Cc: Panicz Maciej Godek , guile-user@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:59:43 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you?
> > If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is that Guile without
> > threads is
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> I guess you didn't configure without threads on GNU/Linux, did you?
> If not, I suggest to try that, my impression is that Guile without
> threads is not used too much on Posix platforms.
Hydra, a continuous integration system, runs Guile's "make check" with
threads disab
> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:05:13 +0200
> From: Panicz Maciej Godek
> Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org"
>
> 2013/8/24 Eli Zaretskii
>
> > > yes, it seems that this was the reason. So now the guile
> > > interpreter runs properly, but I still have a problem with
> > > running a program that, having been
Alexandru Cojocaru writes:
> Hi,
>
> from the GUILE manual [0]:
>
> `eq?' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
> comparison)
> `eqv?' extends `eq?' to look at the value of numbers and
> characters.
>
> this is what I get:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
>
Klaus Schilling wrote:
> From: Matt Wette
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Guile-WM 0.1/Guile XCB 1.1
> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:40:18 -0700
>
> > FYI, there is also "sawfish" : http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
> >
> > I used sawfish (aka sawmill?) many years ago
> >
> > On Aug 24, 2013, a
Hello,
eq? and eqv? are sort of a funny pair. eqv? actually has sensible semantics
- if two things are eqv?, then a normal scheme program should never notice
the difference between them (they are operationally equivalent). eq? is
defined not in terms of Scheme, but in terms of Scheme's implementat
|Hi,
from the GUILE manual [0]:|
||
`eq?|' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
comparison)
`eqv?'| extends |`eq?'| to look at the value of numbers and characters.
this is what I get:
scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
$1 = #t
is this behavior intentional o
28 matches
Mail list logo
