I've had the AIscm code on my laptop for months, I was looking at how
to do something with GOOPS. Nice work, and I hope you continue on it.
Another "me too".
Matthew Keeter writes:
> However, if I make an empty environment with (null-environment), it
> doesn’t have useful functions like + and *; looks like (make-module)
> has the same issue.
Adding the (guile) module to the environment is going to provide a sane
base environment.
Let's implement som
> On Friday, June 10, 2016 3:31 PM, Matthew Keeter
> wrote:
> > The specific use case is for dataflow graphs, where you’re evaluating a
> > bunch of
> small
> snippets of code that can refer to each other by name.
>
> I’d like to make an environment in which the variables in the same subg
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:44:43 -0400
Matthew Keeter wrote:
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> You’ll be sad to hear that I’ve solved the problem by switching to
> Racket – (make-base-namespace) creates the kind of temporary
> environment I needed, and multiple calls produce multiple independent
> namespac
The specific use case is for dataflow graphs, where you’re evaluating a bunch
of small
snippets of code that can refer to each other by name.
I’d like to make an environment in which the variables in the same subgraph are
exposed as no-argument thunks.
For example, let’s say I have one subgraph
> First of all: is the "sandboxing" aspect of these environment important?
Taylan,
Thanks, that's exactly what I meant by "motivation" in my first reply.
(There was a recent, 6 months ago or so, thread on sandboxing in
guile-user by the way.)
Was Matt trying to prevent _access_ (inaccessible vs.
Hi Jan,
Jan Wedekind writes:
> Yes, here are some examples with empty arrays and arrays with 250,000
> elements. I hope that the upcoming Guile version 2.2 will help increase
> performance as well.
>
> $ make bench
> Making bench in bench
> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jan/
Basa Centro writes:
> Matt and List,
>
> As a matter of fact, I've been thinking about defecting to MIT/GNU
> Scheme if I don't get better support for scmutils and C++ FFI. :)
>
> Come on now Guilers, we can't have people defecting to Racket.
>
> Is there equivalent functionality in Guile to Rack
Matt and List,
As a matter of fact, I've been thinking about defecting to MIT/GNU
Scheme if I don't get better support for scmutils and C++ FFI. :)
Come on now Guilers, we can't have people defecting to Racket.
Is there equivalent functionality in Guile to Racket's
make-base-namespace, as Matt n
Thanks for the reply!
You’ll be sad to hear that I’ve solved the problem by switching to Racket –
(make-base-namespace) creates the kind of temporary environment I needed,
and multiple calls produce multiple independent namespaces.
-Matt
On Jun 10, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Basa Centro wrote:
> Hi Mat
Hi Matthew,
[I know this reply is a little delayed. Please let us know how you
did it if you have already solved the problem.]
Are you using eval-string?
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Fly-Evaluation.html#Fly-Evaluation
It might help for you to post a minimal code sample o
I've installed from debian repo and tried all the example code, very
cool and impressive! Thanks for the work!
Last months I tried matrix operations in Guile and ChezScheme, it's too
slow. I expect to do some machine learning things to control robot car
with the camera. And I found AIscm has the ba
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Jan Wedekind skribis:
Here is an example adding an integer to each element of a 2D array
and returning the result:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops) (aiscm jit) (aiscm int)
(aiscm pointer) (ai
Jan Wedekind skribis:
> Here is an example adding an integer to each element of a 2D array
> and returning the result:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (oop goops) (aiscm jit) (aiscm int)
> (aiscm pointer) (aiscm sequence))
> scheme@(guile-user
14 matches
Mail list logo
