Hi Matt!
Thanks for the help.
However, it seems doesn't work for me. I think your solution is to solve
mixed guile version detection issue, right?
I'm building it in docker, a pure clean Debian10 environment. Hmm...
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:29 AM Matt Wette wrote:
>
>
> On 1/3/20 10:44 AM, Matt
On Sun, 05 Jan 2020 21:15:52 +0100
Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Sun 01 Dec 2019 21:41, Chris Vine writes:
> > Is this rewrite, and the new with-exception-handler procedure, an
> > opportunity to think about standardization of guile's implementation of
> > the R6RS/R7RS 'guard' form, or at least think a
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 19:22:14 +0100
Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> I think the decision tree calculations, which I want to parallelize, are
> not I/O related. However, I am not quite sure I understand the whole
> suspendable port thing, but here is what I think it is:
>
> When some I/O happens in a fib
Hi Chris!
On 1/5/20 3:23 PM, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 13:58:24 +0100
> Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>> Thank you for the detailed explanation!
>>
>> By "process" I meant only "sequence of steps performed", the main thunk
>> in run-fibers, separate from the steps that are run in the spaw
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 13:58:24 +0100
Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed explanation!
>
> By "process" I meant only "sequence of steps performed", the main thunk
> in run-fibers, separate from the steps that are run in the spawned
> fiber, not really OS process or thread.
>
> I wi
Thank you for the detailed explanation!
By "process" I meant only "sequence of steps performed", the main thunk
in run-fibers, separate from the steps that are run in the spawned
fiber, not really OS process or thread.
I will take a look again at the parallel forms and think about whether I
want
Thank you for your answer!
I think the example with channels, which I sent later goes in the
direction your are describing : )
Yes, I am not planning on modifying shared state and doing the whole
mutex stuff.
Regards,
Zelphir
On 1/5/20 3:42 AM, John Cowan wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 5:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 02:30:06 +0100
Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
[snip]
> This way of communication between the fiber and the main process seems
> in the style of Racket's places. Except that I can send normal
> procedures / lambdas to the fiber, which is great on a single machine,
> while I need to sen
On Fri 03 Jan 2020 06:34, Nala Ginrut writes:
> When I was trying to compile Artanis, the configure threw an error:
>
> checking for Guile version >= 3.0... configure: error: Guile 3.0 required,
> but 2.9.8 found
>
>
> Here's what I put i
