I thought about it recently, but with the upcoming srfi-197 (among others, the
chain macro) it felt rather pointless. It does absolutely the same thing, and
to my surprise I received a "thank you" for valuable input in the srfi
document. I happened to suggest the same syntax I had settled on, ta
Hi again,
"mayur...@kathe.in" writes:
> I was using the "load" method as is usually the case.
>
> Try running the "acronym" example at;
> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~bh/ssch1/showing.html
It works for me using 'load' and with this example.
> Occurs to me that I could be doing something
On Saturday, August 08, 2020 12:48 AM IST, Timothy Sample
wrote:
> Hi Mayuresh
>
> "mayur...@kathe.in" writes:
>
> > On Friday, August 07, 2020 05:24 PM IST, Ricardo Wurmus
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Is there something specific that isn’t working for you when using this
> >> in Guile?
> >
> > Everyth
On Saturday, August 08, 2020 08:07 AM IST, mayur...@kathe.in
wrote:
> On Saturday, August 08, 2020 12:48 AM IST, Timothy Sample
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mayuresh
> >
> > "mayur...@kathe.in" writes:
> >
> > > On Friday, August 07, 2020 05:24 PM IST, Ricardo Wurmus
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is there
> This is really cool!
Thanks!
> Maybe it doesn't make sense, but could the `(guile ...) be handled by
> the same running process instead of creating another process, so you
> just pass this to the plumber?
Yes, it makes sense when a Guile code runs locally; it could be possible
to run the code
