On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 18:45 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Richard Shann
> > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 14:22:12 +0100
> >
> > Should I expect the procedure ftw to work on Microsoft file
> > systems?
> > A call that works on Unix seems to hang on M/S
>
Should I expect the procedure ftw to work on Microsoft file systems?
A call that works on Unix seems to hang on M/S
And, for good measure, what is the "command processor" that will be
invoked by the system and system* procedures?
Richard Shann
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 13:16 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > Can anyone explain what is going on when you try to store strings with
> > non-ASCII characters? Here is an example:
> >
> > guile> (define another-data "Čć")
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 10:43 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Richard Shann
> wrote:
> > I should have said:
> > guile --version
> > Guile 1.8.8
>
> I don't think that you will find much help for this version of Guile
> here
I should have said:
guile --version
Guile 1.8.8
Richard
On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 15:05 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> Can anyone explain what is going on when you try to store strings with
> non-ASCII characters? Here is an example:
>
> guile> (define another-data "Čć")
er-data to give "Čć" not
"�\x8c�\x87" (what is that?)...
My problem comes with storing an association list with the second
element a string with a non-ASCII character in it. I'm storing the alist
as a string with
(format #f "'~s" myalist)
but when I try to store this string on disk using XML it barfs on
reloading.
Richard Shann
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 00:01 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Richard Shann :
>
> > I've come across some (working) scheme code whose meaning I can't
> > unravel. The problem is there is a "." character whose significance
> > eludes me. The guile refer
oot?)
,exception-markup
.
,(if (ly:pitch? bass-pitch)
(list (ly:context-property context 'slashChordSeparator)
(name-note bass-pitch #f))
'()
Richard Shann
Thanks for all the replies - sorry I didn't spot that section of the
manual (perhaps because it came under "Using modules" and I haven't
dipped my toes in that stuff).
I have it working now.
Richard
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 12:34 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann w
ot;, scm_to_locale_string (bar));
etc...
Richard Shann
Hmm, yes of course, I looked up minus and negate and so on in the index,
forgetting that non-words are also indexed...
thank you!
Richard
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 13:30 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > Is there something neater than
> >
> > (- 0 amo
Is there something neater than
(- 0 amount)
to negate a number? Can't spot anything in the manual ...
Richard Shann
On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 11:07 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Mon 02 Sep 2013 10:48, Richard Shann writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 12:14 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> >> >> 2. In the inner_main of your scm_with_guile call,
> >>
> >> >> tr
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 12:17 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 19:53 +0200, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
> > [...]
> >>pt_BR.utf8 is not a supported locale on your system.
> >
> > yes, that is why I chose it, so
o that when I understand it better.
Thank you for the response,
Richard Shann
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 12:14 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> >> 2. In the inner_main of your scm_with_guile call,
>
> >> try calling scm_setlocale. Maybe something like this?
> >> (This shouldn't make a difference, I think.
> >> But, if it does, it says something interesting.)
> >>
> >> scm_setl
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:45 -0700, Mike Gran wrote:
> Hi Richard-
>
>
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (string-append " " "hello")
>
> > $1 = " \ue176hello"
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (display " ")
> > scheme@(guile-user)> (display (string-append " "
> > "hello"))
> > helloscheme@(guile-us
side Denemo scm_c_eval_string() is being used to evaluate a
string that includes this wide character and that is throwing the
exception.
Richard
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 14:50 +0200, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
> 2013/8/22 Richard Shann
> GNU/Denemo has a number of guile scripts in whi
tting
setlocale (LC_ALL, "C.UTF-8")
in the above initialization sequence does not affect the behavior.
Richard
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 14:50 +0200, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
> 2013/8/22 Richard Shann
> GNU/Denemo has a number of guile scripts in which wide
> charact
t "~%=> ~A~%"" ")
; the throw arguments are
(scm_to_stringn cannot convert wide string to output locale 84 #f #f)
what is "locale 84" and how can I return to the desired behavior?
Richard Shann
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 05:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Gran wrote:
>
>
> > From: Richard Shann
> >> > From: Richard Shann
> >> >
> >> > I have just started using GNU/Denemo under the guile 2.x and the
> >> > following c
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Gran wrote:
> > From: Richard Shann
> >
> > I have just started using GNU/Denemo under the guile 2.x and the
> > following construct no longer works:
> >
> > (if (not (defined? 'ToggleFiguredBassMode::Activ
I have just started using GNU/Denemo under the guile 2.x and the
following construct no longer works:
(if (not (defined? 'ToggleFiguredBassMode::Active))
(define ToggleFiguredBassMode::Active #f))
The intention is to have a variable defined at the top level which
starts out being #f. The nee
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 16:13 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 27 Feb 2013 16:08, Andy Wingo writes:
>
> > Here is a Guile 2-compatible version:
> >
> > (cond-expand
> >(guile-2) ; nothing
> >(else ; guile < 2.0
> > (define-macro (define-once sym exp)
> > `(define ,sym (if (mod
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 06:48 -0800, Mike Gran wrote:
> > From: Richard Shann
> >
> > Thanks for this - it seems define-once is not defined in guile 1.8
> > however, so while some systems only have guile 2.0 (Fedora) and others
> > only have guile 1.8 (Debian stabl
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 08:19 -0500, m...@markwitmer.com wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > We have one more construct being refused as we upgrade to guile 2.0 in
> > GNU/Denemo
> >
> > (if (not (defined? 'ToggleTripleting::InsideTriplet))
> > (
ny mechanism to get
initialized, other than this construct.
Richard Shann
)
>
> in stead!
>
> /Stefan
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Richard Shann
> wrote:
> > In GNU/Denemo we have some scheme which has been working in guile 1.8
> > but which fails (if I have tested correctly) in guile 2.0
> > Apparently the code originated
fail? (I am running
Debian stable myself so don't have direct access to guile 2.x so my
testing is limited). - Richard Shann
(define-macro defstruct
(lambda (s . ff)
(let ((s-s (symbol->string s)) (n (length ff)))
(let* ((n+1 (+ n 1))
(vv (make-vector n+1)))
(
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 12:03 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
> > configure:31783: checking for main in -lregex
> > configure:31812: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -o conftest.exe
> > -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
> > -I/home/rshann/mxe/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 10:05 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> I noticed that the invocation of the guile build was accepting the
> default for regex, so I tried setting it explicitly
> with --enable-regex=yes in the configure. With this I see in
> config.log
>
> configure:31783: ch
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 21:02 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
> > On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 10:35 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> >> This is an unrelated problem, namely that './configure' is apparently
> >> unable to find a suitable POSIX
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 10:35 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
> > With this Denemo starts up looking very good - no error messages from
> > any of the scheme executed on startup.
>
> Good. I think the SRFI problem is finally solved.
>
> > How
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 21:00 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Don't worry, we'll get it working. Here's another attempt.
> Replace the calls to 'scm_c_register_extension' with the following:
>
> scm_c_call_with_current_module (scm_c_resolve_module ("guile"),
>
More on that call to
scm_c_call_with_current_module (scm_c_resolve_module ("srfi srfi-1"),
init_srfi_1, NULL);
I have had a look using gdb and it is exiting during the call to
scm_c_resolve_module()
HTH
Richard
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 10:32 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
> > Well it seems I may have been premature in saying that srfi-1 was
> > successfully loaded. Although the error message is gone, there is no
> > symbol 'map which srfi-1 should have re
I can feed it any
scheme expression and have it evaluated to debug the problem...
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:11 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Richard Shann writes:
> >
> >>
> >
> > The problem is the call to 'load-extension
r the rapid response.
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:11 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Richard Shann writes:
> >
> >>
> >
> > The problem is the call to 'load-extension' near the top of
> > 'srfi-1.scm', which again
e me tracking
through the libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-3.a code?
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 12:27 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 08 Feb 2013 10:25, Richard Shann
> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:24 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> >> Is it possible to statical
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:02 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> Hmm, I can't find scm_c_register_extension in the guile reference index,
> and though including libguile.h finds the function I get the error
> message scm_init_srfi_1 undeclared...
> Hunting around for this symbol I see
h"
gives a heap of errors...
It looks like this module is the only one doing the dynamic loading
thing, judging by grepping for extension in the files, but is there a
way of knowing?
Thanks in advance,
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 12:27 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 08 Feb 2013 10
Oh - sorry, I should have mentioned, we are still on guile 1.8 (perhaps
for no good reason?), if that affects the answer.
Richard
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:24 +, Richard Shann wrote:
> Is it possible to statically link in the srfi modules? For GNU/Denemo we
> are currently tryin
eady built in mxe
as static libraries; is there a way to build guile with the srfi stuff
ready linked in?
Richard Shann
Thank you! I am much clearer on the meaning of quote now.
Richard Shann
> On Dec 7, 2012 5:51 AM, "Richard Shann" wrote:
> > If I pass 'a in as a parameter I get something back which prints on
> the
> > console as (quote a) but which is not eq? to 'a
>
on the menu, do-offset is returned but I get the error message
(#f Wrong type to apply: ~S (do-offset) #f)
(BTW I can't find a blow by blow explanation of this error message
anywhere, I see some discussion of earlier versions of it on the net...)
Anyone able to help?
Richard Shann
Thanks for this, I see there is also scm_is_true to take care of the
possibility that SCM_BOOL_T might not be a scalar type, we should be
using that too.
Richard
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 12:01 -0400, guile-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > I didn't
00, r...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I have defined a function with one needed and one optional arg, using
> >
> > scm_c_define_gsubr (name, 2, 0, 0, callback);
> >
> > in my function I need to test if the second ar
environment?
Richard Shann
manual
(again?)
Richard Shann
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 18:56 +, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Linas Vepstas writes:
>
> > 2009/12/2 Neil Jerram :
> > Neil,
> >
> > For my own edification -- is tehre any difference between
> >
> >> (let ((sym (with-input-from-string mything read)))
> >
> > and
> >
> > (let ((sym (string->symbol mythi
Thanks to all guileans who have responded. I seem to have a workable
solution based on Neil's code. The thing I hadn't grokked was the
existence of the with-input-from-string procedure. I had been messing
with defined? and symbol? but got nowhere.
FWIW the core bit of code I ended up with takes th
d to hold.
Any help much appreciated!
Richard Shann
Works like a dream - thank you!
Richard
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 22:41 +, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > Thanks for this: the only problem might be that it is the top-level
> > definitions in Denemo's initialization script that I want to list. I
>
D: <87ws1nfk3u@gnu.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hi,
>
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > I wonder if anyone knows of a method to extract a list of top-level
> > procedure definitions from a string?
>
> You can use module-for-eac
.
Richard Shann
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 14:00 +0100, Paul Emsley wrote:
> Richard Shann wrote:
> >
> > SCM proc = gh_str2scm("d-UploadRoutine", strlen("d-UploadRoutine"));
> > // proc = scm_string_to_symbol("d-UploadRoutine");
> > // proc = scm_string
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 06:17 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> 2009/8/2 Richard Shann :
> > Hi,
> > I want to call a scheme procedure with four arguments from C.
> > (The example scheme procedure here is just displaying its arguments.)
> >
> > (define (d-Uploa
argument in position 1 (expecting string): 33820865
ERROR: In procedure apply:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1: d-UploadRoutine
It seems to me the docs are rather deficient here! They don't give the types of
the
arguments, and the header only tells you they are SCM...
Help much appreciated,
Richard Shann
Thanks for the info: as we have gtk in Denemo I've used that - just
didn't want to be doing something stupid!
Richard
> > Does anyone know if there is a guile procedure to get the (text)
> > selection? (That is from doing Copy in another application)
> > Richard
>
> I assume you mean in the X sen
Does anyone know if there is a guile procedure to get the (text)
selection? (That is from doing Copy in another application)
Richard
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:01 -0400, guile-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> Ludovic Courts wrote:
> > Richard Shann writes:
> >
> >> conftest.c:94:19: regex.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > That means that either is simply not available in MinGW,
Thanks very much for the help, I'll have to look further at mingw.
Richard
>
> > conftest.c:94:19: regex.h: No such file or directory
>
> That means that either is simply not available in MinGW, or
> it's optional, I don't know.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo'.
>
> It should be available as long as Guile is configured with
> `--enable-regex' (which is the default) and regcomp(3) is provided by
> the C library, which I'd expect to be the case here.
>
> Can you show the result of "grep regcomp config.log" when configured
> on
> MinGW?
This gives nothing bu
In porting GNU Denemo to windows I noticed that make-regexp is not
present. I found an obscure comment in one file that indicates this is a
known limitation. Can anyone confirm this? Are there some release notes
that I should have seen?
Is it a problem that is likely to be fixed?
Richard Shann
64 matches
Mail list logo
