Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-10 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
:) 2016-02-09 19:41 GMT+01:00 Lawrence Bottorff : > Good, good. > > >> 3. I'm not quite convinced whether \texttt{equivalence-classes} should >> be replaced with \textit{equivalence-classes}. If we actually decide >> to do so, I think it would be better to replace it as >> \textit{equivalence cla

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-09 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Good, good. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > 2016-02-07 22:51 GMT+01:00, Lawrence Bottorff : > > I've got this fork going where > I've > > done some editing (grammar, style, spelling, etc.) on the book (up to > > "Reporting bugs."

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-09 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:58:41PM +0100, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: [...] > (I wonder whether we should switch to private correspondence, or > doesn't anyone mind having such updates here?) Just lurker here, so weigh my vote accordingly. But I'm de

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-08 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2016-02-07 22:51 GMT+01:00, Lawrence Bottorff : > I've got this fork going where I've > done some editing (grammar, style, spelling, etc.) on the book (up to > "Reporting bugs." Let me know what you think. I'm really impressed! Thanks! :) However, I do have so

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-07 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
I've got this fork going where I've done some editing (grammar, style, spelling, etc.) on the book (up to "Reporting bugs." Let me know what you think. In general, I think Scheme desperately needs an "O'Reilly"-style book. Question: What should we say when so

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-07 Thread A0
On 06/02/16 00:47, Cao Jin wrote: > It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never > tried R. As for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art > library in R and Matlab. > > After skimming your paper, I wander that 1) Are these library used > in your code example implemented

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-06 Thread Jan Wedekind
On 6. Februar 2016 06:08:42 GMT+00:00, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: >Hi > >2016-02-06 1:47 GMT+01:00 Cao Jin : > >> It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never tried >R. As >> for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art library in R and >Matlab. >> >> After skimming your pa

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-06 Thread Cao Jin
Hi Panicz, Thank you for these information. On 2/6/2016 14:08, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > Hi > > 2016-02-06 1:47 GMT+01:00 Cao Jin mailto:l...@null.net>>: > > It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never > tried R. As for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art >

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-06 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > I also think it would be helpful to interface Guile with plot generation. I > see that Nala has a guile-plot package, but I haven't tried it. I > personally wrote some code for generating LaTeX pgfplots for the project, > and can add it to the repo if you llike. A g

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
Hi 2016-02-06 1:47 GMT+01:00 Cao Jin : > It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never tried R. As > for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art library in R and Matlab. > > After skimming your paper, I wander that > 1) Are these library used in your code example implemente

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Cao Jin
It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never tried R. As for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art library in R and Matlab. After skimming your paper, I wander that 1) Are these library used in your code example implemented by yourself? Or other libraries are called, su

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
Hi Amirouche, thanks for these nice words! 2016-02-05 19:55 GMT+01:00 Amirouche Boubekki : > > I skimmed over the book and it's really good, my take away: > > - I should probably study better how you introduce match > I have to admit that I've rushed off with the patern matcher rather quickly, b

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2016-02-05 17:44 GMT+01:00 Christopher Allan Webber : > Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > > >> CC BY-SA 4.0 is actually what I've been thinking about. > > I will add the legal notice by the end of the day (I only realized the > lack > > of it while I was writing the announcement) > > > > > >> I see

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
2016-02-05 20:46 GMT+01:00 Lawrence Bottorff : > Say, would you like me to suggest some editing changes? Your English is > great, but I've noticed a few errors. > Sure, that would be awesome! I don't think that I ever manage to work out anything comparable to native profficiency in English, but I

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Say, would you like me to suggest some editing changes? Your English is great, but I've noticed a few errors. Lawrence Bottorff On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > Hi, > I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled > > A Pamphlet against R > Computat

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
Héllo Panicz, Le 2016-02-05 00:09, Panicz Maciej Godek a écrit : Hi, I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled A Pamphlet against R Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries that I have been dev

Re: Fwd: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > I see you're an expert, so perhaps you could explain to me what would the > implications be. > My original intent was to publish the software that comes along with the > book under GPL v3, because AFAIK GPL regards software, but if there's more > to it, then it would

Fwd: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 Thread A0
Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:08:46 + From: A0 To: Panicz Maciej Godek Wow! What an incendiary title. I loved R before it turned into an improved Java. On 04/02/16 23:09, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: >

Fwd: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-04 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
-- Forwarded message -- From: Panicz Maciej Godek Date: 2016-02-05 8:21 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile To: Christopher Allan Webber Hello Chris 2016-02-05 1:30 GMT+01:00 Christopher Allan Webber : > Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > > &g

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-04 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: | A Pamphlet against R | Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme \-- It would be good to emphasis on Guile Scheme and how it is helpful in computational intelligence, and remove any negative connotation with R. You do want

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-04 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > Hi, > I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled > > A Pamphlet against R > Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme > > The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries > that I have been developing over the last few

[ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-04 Thread Panicz Maciej Godek
Hi, I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled A Pamphlet against R Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries that I have been developing over the last few months, including topics like: - genetic