Alexandru Cojocaru writes:
> `eq?' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
> comparison)
> `eqv?' extends `eq?' to look at the value of numbers and
> characters.
>
> this is what I get:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
> $1 = #t
>
> is this behavior intention
Alexandru Cojocaru writes:
> Hi,
>
> from the GUILE manual [0]:
>
> `eq?' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
> comparison)
> `eqv?' extends `eq?' to look at the value of numbers and
> characters.
>
> this is what I get:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
>
Hello,
eq? and eqv? are sort of a funny pair. eqv? actually has sensible semantics
- if two things are eqv?, then a normal scheme program should never notice
the difference between them (they are operationally equivalent). eq? is
defined not in terms of Scheme, but in terms of Scheme's implementat
|Hi,
from the GUILE manual [0]:|
||
`eq?|' tests just for the same object (essentially a pointer
comparison)
`eqv?'| extends |`eq?'| to look at the value of numbers and characters.
this is what I get:
scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? 3 (+ 1 2))
$1 = #t
is this behavior intentional o
