Hi Linus,
thank you for your tipps!
Linus Björnstam writes:
> Can you use the procedural part of syntax-rules? You have the power of
> using scheme at expansion time, which means you could do list-ref all
> you want.
>
> That "syntax-rules" is of course syntax-case.
>
> The only thing is tha
On 05.04.2021 13:30, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
> user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
> strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
>
> (define-syntax-r
On Monday, 5 April 2021 13:30:21 CEST you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
> user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
> strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
>
> (define-syntax-rule (
That "syntax-rules" is of course syntax-case.
Try writing it first with unhygienic macros and get that working before porting
to syntax-case if you don't know the ins-and-outs of syntax-case.
--
Linus Björnstam
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021, at 14:21, Linus Björnstam wrote:
> Can you use the procedural
Can you use the procedural part of syntax-rules? You have the power of using
scheme at expansion time, which means you could do list-ref all you want.
The only thing is that guile lacks syntax->list, so sometimes you have to
manually turn it into a list. Say you are matching ((_ stuff ...) Body)
Hi,
In dryads-wake I need selection of the element in a list in a macro from
user-input. Currently I have multiple macros, and the correct one (which
strips the non-selected choices) is selected in a simple cond:
(define-syntax-rule (Choose resp . choices)
"Ask questions, apply consequences"
