Re: [h-cost] RE: subject lines

2006-07-18 Thread Robin Netherton
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Lavolta Press wrote: > I also like Yahoo lists because you can drop in and read emails now > and then whenever you feel like it, without receiving messages > automatically, or you can receive them automatically if you prefer. > Yahoo also keeps archives. H-cost is now arch

Re: [h-cost] RE: subject lines

2006-07-18 Thread Lavolta Press
Unless a person is receiving digest format, in which case you get all the good and bad anyway, scan subjects, and choose from there. That is why I find individual messages to be more efficient than digests. You can set up a mail folder for a specific e-group, and have all messages f

Re: [h-cost] RE: subject lines

2006-07-18 Thread Ingrid G . Storrø
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Five Rivers Chapmanry wrote: > Not to be a wet blanket, but people don't change subject lines. They > aren't going to use prefixes with any consistency either. Not here. It may be possible that it's a lost cause. But couldn't we try? :) If everyone spent thirty seconds m

[h-cost] RE: subject lines

2006-07-18 Thread Five Rivers Chapmanry
Fran wrote: Anyone who wishes is welcome to filter out all my emails by my sender address, or any other means their email program or ISP supports. Unless a person is receiving digest format, in which case you get all the good and bad anyway, scan subjects, and choose from there. The fac