Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Ismet Kursunoglu
I wouldn't put '.' (dot) in the path of any sensitive account - in fact I would never put it in the search path on your production server. Of course that could be tough to enforce for your regular users. This way you protect your system from various Trojans, the myriad of methods to steal the sup

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Suchi Pande
A not-very-steep reference to linux is at: http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz (Or apt-get install rutebook in Debian.) Other free licence books are linked at http://www.freetechbooks.com/ regards PJ --- Using Tomcat but need to do more?

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Alan O'Neill
That's excellent news! While I am frustrated by sites that *require* the use of Flash, sometimes I do need to visit them. Sadly, though, Debian 64-bit does not seem to have this package [yet]. :( I'll be converting a personal computer (32-bit) to Debian (actually Ubuntu) in the near future, a

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Bhaskar, KS
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 09:02 -0500, Alan O'Neill wrote: > Hi Bhaskar, > > Yep, I agree that the package management under Linux (in particular > with Debian and Debian-like) is excellent. I was thinking more about > installing something like a flash player or "John Doe's Software" > where a .deb or

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Alan O'Neill
Hi Bhaskar, Yep, I agree that the package management under Linux (in particular with Debian and Debian-like) is excellent. I was thinking more about installing something like a flash player or "John Doe's Software" where a .deb or .rpm file is not available. It takes me back to the days of DO

RE: [Hardhats-members] more Linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Aylesworth, Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE
13441-4505 Tel:315.330.2422 Fax:315.330.7009 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan O'Neill Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:38 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] more

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Good point Bhaskar. I'll just leave such "upgrades" alone. Thanks, Kevin On 5/11/06, Bhaskar, KS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:05 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: ... It occurs to me that you may be trying to mix a production VistA environment (where you shouldn't be ins

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Bhaskar, KS
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:38 -0500, Alan O'Neill wrote: [KSB] <...snip...> > Linux is getting better about package management, but sadly it still > has a long way to go before it is as clean as Windows (when Windows > works). I like Debian's synaptic GUI installer, but even that would > not help

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
On 5/11/06, Alan O'Neill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Kevin, For question 1: --- Thanks Alan... --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated techno

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Bhaskar, KS
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 08:05 -0500, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: > I have two linux questions. I guess I am still a linux newbie by > relative standards. > > 1. Executing a binary file that has execute permissions: why can't I > just type the name of the file? For example: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] gtm

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Alan O'Neill
Hi Kevin, For question 1: --- If you would like a command in the current directory (wherever you may be) to execute, you would have to add a dot (".") to your PATH variable. To view the current value of PATH, issue the command echo $PATH In my case, my PATH is /home/alan/bin:

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Thanks Dennis and Mike. I guess I had "." on my path before, because I don't remember having this issue on my prior distro. Your explainations help. Thanks! Kevin On 5/11/06, Dennis Ballance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On #1, it's a security feature. It keeps your current directory from alwa

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
On May 11, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Dennis Ballance wrote:On #1, it's a security feature. It keeps your current directory from always inserting itself in the search path. If, for instance, you created a small text file called "rm", then tried to remove it by typing "rm rm", it would tell you "cannot execu

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Dennis Ballance
On #1, it's a security feature. It keeps your current directory from always inserting itself in the search path. If, for instance, you created a small text file called "rm", then tried to remove it by typing "rm rm", it would tell you "cannot execute rm" because, instead of looking in /usr/bin,

Re: [Hardhats-members] more linux questions

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Schrom
Kevin, 1. It's like a DOS command line, but the ./ tells linux to look in the current directory. 2. Some installers/upgrade tools require to specify a source, like sourceforge, freshrpms etc., and if you don't provide one they look in your 'installation source', i.e. the cd you installed fro