From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I guess that the reason why Jikes RVM does not have an interpreter is
> mainly its implementation language Java, not for performance:
> Imagine us implementing an interpreter in Java language. We need
> another Java runtime to execute the interpreter, otherwise the
> in
From: Rafal Lewczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Things like ORP (and propably Jikes - not
> sure) are intentionally omitting interpreter, relying on a fast,
> non-optimizing JIT instead. I don't know but it may affect some design
> decisions. Assuming that framework = set of interfaces (for example
> GC
Geir,
When and where will the Harmony group meet at JavaOne? We could use
this meeting to talk about projects and the roadmap bullets in your
presentation.
Weldon
On 6/27/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote:
>
> > Geir,
>
Geir,
Any update on when Apache will have a license in place so that code
can be donated to Apache Harmony project?
Thanks
Weldon
On 6/24/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 24, 2005, at 5:17 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote:
>
> > On 6/23/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL
Tom,
Thanks for being on topic. This thread has drifted all over the place.
I wasn't thinking clearly on the proposed interface. Your suggestion
is the correct way to go. I was originally thinking that the below
interface would be macros that are used to pull the relevant bits out
of the "modi
On Jun 27, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote:
Geir,
The below is good. Under project goals, I would add that we want
Harmony to run commercially relevant workloads.
I agree - it's very important we drive that point home. I have that
in there as a major goal...
I would also add
Geir,
The below is good. Under project goals, I would add that we want
Harmony to run commercially relevant workloads.
I would also add rationale for modularizing the JVM. The text for
this topic would be something like:
- increased project efficiency. Open Source volunteers can make
contribu
> "Weldon" == Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Weldon> Below is a first stab at the API to retrieve the values
Weldon> contained in internal classloader data structures.
Weldon> Comment/questions are appreciated.
Weldon> Class access and property modifiers (table 4.1)
Weldon> bool
Rafal Lewczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> optimizing VM. On the other hand, resource constrained environments
>> require VMs with as little footprint as possible. My question is: does
>> it make sense to make all-in-one framework or maybe designing two
>> execution engines, maybe sharing some co
> optimizing VM. On the other hand, resource constrained environments
> require VMs with as little footprint as possible. My question is: does
> it make sense to make all-in-one framework or maybe designing two
> execution engines, maybe sharing some code but having two different
> designs (object
10 matches
Mail list logo
