El lun, 25-07-2005 a las 08:56 -0500, netsql escribió:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
> >
> > - requiring a CCLA from employers : I've dropped this, as it's
> > impractical, although we must encourage people to get them if possible,
> > and should work to set an example if we can
> >
> >
> >
That sounds like a perfectly reasonable pattern. Graeme's earlier
description [1] is a coarse grained approach, which says if the class
has a close VM dependency then we leave it up to the VM-implementor to
provide it ;-) For types like Object that is not onerous since there is
not much behavior
Tim Ellison wrote:
So in OSGi R4 you can export/import individual classes as well as entire
packages?
No, but you can include/exclude classes from a package, sort of like
selecting files in Ant.
What do you mean by 'mandatory attributes'? Is this a conditional
export/import?
Bette
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> I assume that what we really need is two kinds of component export,
>> the public app level API (java.util.*) and a public-yet-not-for-app-
>> but-fellow-traveler API, such as what other conspiring modules would
>> export to each other to p
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I assume that what we really need is two kinds of component export,
the public app level API (java.util.*) and a public-yet-not-for-app-
but-fellow-traveler API, such as what other conspiring modules would
export to each other to provide the full public API.
Kind
On Jul 25, 2005, at 9:56 AM, netsql wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
- requiring a CCLA from employers : I've dropped this, as it's
impractical, although we must encourage people to get them if
possible, and should work to set an example if we can
geir
(sound good to drop it) You ca
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
- requiring a CCLA from employers : I've dropped this, as it's
impractical, although we must encourage people to get them if possible,
and should work to set an example if we can
geir
(sound good to drop it) You can just decide what to add and remove as
you
Just as a record :
1) I am working to find a satisfactory resolution to the concern from
some free software community members regarding the incompatibility of
the Apache License and the GPL wrt contributions to our mailing
list. Goal is ASAP
2) I will be running our Authorized Contributo
All,
I apologize for the delay. I have added to our website (please allow
up to 4 hours from now for propagation to public site) :
1) Our proposed contribution framework for the project. This should
currently be considered 'proposed' as we do the final nip-and-tucks,
and get any remain
On Jul 25, 2005, at 7:00 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Tom Tromey wrote:
"Tim" == Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just some random thoughts on this.
Tim> The goal is to (a) stimulate discussion, and (b) think about the
Tim> components that we should declare with well-defined
interface
Yes. The main focus of the Jikes RVM project is VM/JIT research. We've
made minor contributions to the design of the GNU classpath VM/classlib
interface, since we are one of the many runtimes that depend on it, but
we're mainly consumers of class libraries, not producers. As discussed in
more
Tom Tromey wrote:
>>"Tim" == Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Just some random thoughts on this.
>
> Tim> The goal is to (a) stimulate discussion, and (b) think about the
> Tim> components that we should declare with well-defined interfaces to other
> Tim> components (I'm thinki
12 matches
Mail list logo
