On 24 May 2006 at 12:50, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/5/24, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > >
> > > 2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> > > > I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best
> > > > RMI implementation,
+1
TestNG is a next generation of JUnit and standardize a lot of solutions
JUnit develops reinvent every time.
On 5/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also look at TestNG. Someday when I find the time, I'm going to make
the argument we should switch, and don't wish to be held
Folks,
There were several interesting email chains about Harmony VM and MMTK
last year. This topic died in large part because there was no JVM.
Since then, several JVMs have been donated. I volunteer to do an
initial investigation of porting MMTK to the recent DRLVM donation.
From a quick grep
2006/5/24, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>
> 2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> > I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
> > implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
> > forward, with the understanding t
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
> implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
> forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
> work to merge th
I think that contribution authors and everyone who is interested in the areas
will control that their best ideas go to the merged version.
It seems that we do not need a special document about that
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/24, Vladimir Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Who will control the accuracy of t
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
George Harley wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> That is a very good point and your suggestion of supplementing the class
> or package name sounds like a very straightforward way around the
> problem. Because there will be a number of tests that must be i
Who will control the accuracy of this process (I mean merging)?
Obviously we need to have the document substantiating that or other choice.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
work to merge the additional contributio
On 5/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Do you believe you came to a conclusion? Do you want to summarize?
Yes, I'm going to put summary on web-site.
Thanks,
Stepan.
geir
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the last discussion no agreements were made - though it was very
> useful for me
Hi, Svetlana
I took a quick view on your patch, I found your quick fix didn't resolve the
problem thoroughly.
Try to comment following code in your test case, RI fails on the test case
but Harmony with your patch passes.
public boolean isLegalReplacement(byte[] arg0) {
return true;
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
That's great!
I have seen the notification. There are quite a few changes I see.
I've implemented NewWeakGlobalRef in r408937, so that patch is
no longer needed.
If you update make sure you get at least r408953, which contains a bug fix.
-Archie
That's great!
I have seen the notification. There are quite a few changes I see.
--
Ivan
2006/5/23, Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
FYI,
I've implemented NewWeakGlobalRef in r408937, so that patch is
no longer needed.
-Archie
The point is, that I have already signed some papers for my part in
contribution of DRLVM.
Anyway, I can send ACQ and ICLA via fax tommorow.
--
Ivan
2006/5/23, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That said, as Mark pointed out, it would be good to have at least the
ACQ from Ivan, and also the
On 5/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> Returning back to the subject of this discussion, I guess it should be
> relatively easy to modify the DRLVM building system such that it would
> get the binary HDK from web and use it for compilation of a sing
On 5/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:)
geir
*chuckle* Productive plane ride!
James.
--
James Pluck
PalmOS Ergo Sum
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-m
:)
geir
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you believe you came to a conclusion? Do you want to summarize?
geir
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi,
During the last discussion no agreements were made - though it was very
useful for me. And I'd like to start new round for serialization testing. I
want to define rules for locating and naming re
George Harley wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
That is a very good point and your suggestion of supplementing the class
or package name sounds like a very straightforward way around the
problem. Because there will be a number of tests that must be in an
identical package name to the type under test then
And please create new JIRA's for the patches.
Link your new JIRA to the old JIRA that it patches, and have a good
description of what it does, what it replaces, etc If we do this right,
we have a clear chain of JIRAs to follow when we vote and probably*
accept DRLVM.
geir
* because it is s
Vladimir Gorr wrote:
On 5/19/06, Andrey Chernyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/19/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO, I would prefer new patch attached. Say, named like:
> DRLVM-GCC-3.4_and_4.x-cumulative_v2.patch
> DRLVM-GCC-3.4_and_4.x-cumulative_20060519.patch
>
> It
Tim Ellison wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Hi George
Wasn't that you who strictly opposed logging to stderr ~3-5 months ago? :)
As I remember, you said that no one will read that stderr.
I said that (George may have too).
Every test either passes or fails. We can agree that skipped tests
co
I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
work to merge the additional contributions into whatever was chosen.
We then get out of
Some stuff that got lost (because I got consumed by J1 and I was the
only one pushing on it) was the idea of ensuring that
1) the HDK could be anywhere - the was no hard-wired spot. That allowed
having multiple simultaneous HDKs (ex different snapshot version) at the
same time as a full build
On thing to think about (which I didn't realize until now) is that HDK
should sit above /classlib in the tree right? the VMs will need it as
well. I imagine :
enhanced/
classlib/
drlvm/
jchevm/
bootvm/
So maybe add a
enhanced/common
directory in which the HDK sits by def
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
Returning back to the subject of this discussion, I guess it should be
relatively easy to modify the DRLVM building system such that it would
get the binary HDK from web and use it for compilation of a single
module.
I don't understand this sentence. Do you mean a c
That said, as Mark pointed out, it would be good to have at least the
ACQ from Ivan, and also the ICLA
geir
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
Please hold off the check-in for a few days. I would like to try
Ivan's mods on my machine to make certain they are complete. The
intention
When you do the commit, please note the difference in the log message.
(just the list of stuff that didnt' make it. Feel free to use wildcards...)
thx
geir
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
While preparing to commit the javax.crypto and java.math contributions
attached to HARMONY-199 I noticed that
Post J1 catchup. Just minor comments, am trying to read the thread
through...
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 10 May 2006 at 8:07, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AS a matter of fact, I think that the hdk is simple a tar of the junk
created by a "make the world" build...
I wouldn't have
How about a patch for the website, including instructions on what to do?
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
Alex,
Please, find the new version (0.2) and all previous versions here:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12340105
Good. I like it (everyone likes when his suggesti
The JUnit license is compatible with what we are doing, so if there's
something there we can re-use, great.
Also look at TestNG. Someday when I find the time, I'm going to make
the argument we should switch, and don't wish to be held back by JUnit :)
geir
Anton Luht wrote:
Alexander,
I'v
This thread was a long read :)
First, I'm all for using Jetty as our test server (I think we talked
about this a long time ago...). We could even use Tomcat, but my
experience in the past was that Jetty was very easy to emebed. By
default, there should be no external dependency to build, te
George Harley wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George, Tim
I'd like to clarify the following questions:
1) Configuring
As I understood we say that the server is 'embedded' when we can
start/stop
it within Ant without additional configuration steps. And all we need
to do
is just download req
FYI I'm experimenting with launcher changes to support JDK tools.
(javac, javadoc, etc.)
It is work in progress that should not break the existing java launcher
behavior (I am running the tests continuously). You can expect to see
incremental improvements over the next couple of days.
I'll also
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
I have prepared my modifications and posted a patch against the
SVN/classlibadapter.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-483
I was able to get rid of all native modifications and some of modified
classes.
NewWeakGlobalRef implementation on vm needed though.
FYI,
FYI exceptions thrown during a finalize method end the execution of that
method, but otherwise are ignored by the finalizer.
Regards,
Tim
Paulex Yang wrote:
> Gregory,
>
> Sorry I response so late. I just back from a long vacation and it took
> me longer time than I expected to catch up the mail
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George, Paulex,
Thanks for your answers. As a preliminary result - your convinced me
and I'm
going to be volunteer to evaluate jetty integration to classlib test
suite.
Great, thank you, Stepan!
Do anybody work on integrating jetty http server to move net tests ou
Hi George, Paulex,
Thanks for your answers. As a preliminary result - your convinced me and I'm
going to be volunteer to evaluate jetty integration to classlib test suite.
Do anybody work on integrating jetty http server to move net tests out of
exclude list?
Thanks,
Stepan.
On 5/23/06, George
On 5/23/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Stepan,
"No we shouldn't write a mock http server for each case (I mean that we
need
not implement http protocol each time)."
Shall we implement http sometimes? If no, how can we verfiy
HttpURLConnection function, for example, whether the
Paulex Yang wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the
following 4 bytes:
0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
Sure, but if you need control of such level, a mocked SocketListener
may be necessary, check out the codes below, the client socket will
print 0-3, r
Hello Paulex
I have no objections against your changes. A check is always cheaper than
exception.
I just wondered how a user code such as finalizer can affect VM like that,
nothing more.
2006/5/23, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a question about this problem. Do you know how except
George Harley wrote:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/23, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the
following
> 4 bytes:
>
> 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
>
> ?
Have you checked ?
I'm just asking. I do not state that
Hi Mi
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following
4 bytes:
0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
Sure, but if you need control of such level, a mocked SocketListener
may be necessary, check out the codes below, the client socket will
print 0-3, respectively.
publi
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/23, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following
> 4 bytes:
>
> 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
>
> ?
Have you checked ?
I'm just asking. I do not state that
Hi Mikhail,
I misunderstood
Alexander,
I've looked at the existing JUnit extensions and some ot them look
quite similar to your generator proposal at first glance.
The list of extentions is here:
http://www.junit.org/news/extension/index.htm
The most relevant seem to be: JUnitPerf and JMTUnit . I'm not sure
that their l
Hi Mark
2006/5/23, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks, Mark!
Could you please also review my recent changes in crypto's build.xml?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 23 May 2006 at 15:54, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've created reg
it works! :)
2006/5/23, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
String post1=new String("POST");
String post2=new String("POST");
:)
On 5/23/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the only way I've found to make
> two different object instances of "POST" string, such that:
>
>
2006/5/23, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following
> 4 bytes:
>
> 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
>
> ?
Have you checked ?
I'm just asking. I do not state that
Best regards,
George
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> 200
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following
4 bytes:
0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
?
Have you checked ?
Best regards,
George
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 5/23/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
Can jetty send back for example a response consisting of the following 4 bytes:
0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 5/23/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Stepan,
>>
>> "With mock objects this can be done with no problem
String post1=new String("POST");
String post2=new String("POST");
:)
On 5/23/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the only way I've found to make
two different object instances of "POST" string, such that:
post1.equals("POST");
AND
post2.equals("POST");
AND
post1!=post2
Fee
Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi, Stepan,
"With mock objects this can be done with no problems and HARMONY-164
demonstrates the possible way."
Shall we write a mock http server for each case? It takes lots of
reduplicate efforts and results in many mock http server classes in
the end.
In fact, for ma
This is the only way I've found to make
two different object instances of "POST" string, such that:
post1.equals("POST");
AND
post2.equals("POST");
AND
post1!=post2
Feel free to suggest another way
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, Mikhail,
I found some code lo
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/23/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi, Stepan,
"With mock objects this can be done with no problems and HARMONY-164
demonstrates the possible way."
Shall we write a mock http server for each case? It takes lots of
reduplicate efforts and results in many mock http server cl
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi George, Tim
I'd like to clarify the following questions:
1) Configuring
As I understood we say that the server is 'embedded' when we can
start/stop
it within Ant without additional configuration steps. And all we need
to do
is just download required jars. Right?
What
Hi, Stepan,
"No we shouldn't write a mock http server for each case (I mean that we need
not implement http protocol each time)."
Shall we implement http sometimes? If no, how can we verfiy
HttpURLConnection function, for example, whether the request is in http
format,
or chuncked http request.
Hi, Mikhail,
I found some code looks strange in the patch, such as
c.method = pos + t;
c.method = ge+ t;
Is there any reason to write in such way?
Thanks!
On 5/22/06, Mikhail Loenko (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-482?page=comments#action_
Thanks, Mark!
Could you please also review my recent changes in crypto's build.xml?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/23, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 23 May 2006 at 15:54, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created regression test and patch for
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/br
On 23 May 2006 at 15:54, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created regression test and patch for
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-482
>
> I had to make some changes in the luni's build.xml,
> that are intended to be fixed once we all agree with
> proposed test suite
I've created regression test and patch for
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-482
I had to make some changes in the luni's build.xml,
that are intended to be fixed once we all agree with
proposed test suite layout.
Please review the changes.
Thanks,
Mikhail
--
Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
There is now a repackaged version of the IBM VME available at:
https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/preLogin.do?lang=en_US&source=ahdk
The new VME archives are called Harmony-vme-win.IA32-v3.zip for Windows
and Harmony-vme-linux.I
On 5/23/06, Andrew Zhang wrote:
Hi, Stepan,
"With mock objects this can be done with no problems and HARMONY-164
demonstrates the possible way."
Shall we write a mock http server for each case? It takes lots of
reduplicate efforts and results in many mock http server classes in the
end.
No
62 matches
Mail list logo
