Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Richard Liang wrote:
>
>> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
>> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through
toPattern.
>> Now the problem is the r
I had same problems several days ago, and I finally resolved it in same
way - move the local copy to c:\harmony. IIRC, some html files in some
sandbox directory has very long names.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
It's hard to imagine I'm writing this in 2006, but it seems that our
paths in classlib,
I'm having a little trouble w/ classlib build when invoking from an ant
task outside of trunk/
To demonstrate, go to enhanced/classlib and run the following ant script :
It bombs because there is some confusion about basedir or something :
C:\dev\apache\harmony\enhanced\
It's hard to imagine I'm writing this in 2006, but it seems that our
paths in classlib, plus a root directory that is some number of
directories from c:, can be so long that svn and other tools choke under
WinXP.
I'm not completely sure, but after battling what appeared to be
problematic .svn/tmp
George Harley wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order
to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included
and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be
agreed by the pro
George Harley wrote:
Hi Alexei,
It's encouraging to hear that (Ant + TestNG + sample tests) all worked
fine together on Harmony. In answer to your question I suppose that
the ability to fork the tests in a separate VM means that we do not
run the risk of possible bugs in Harmony affecting t
On the 0x1AB day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > Seems like the best choice is to start from a couple of easy heuristics:
> > * if there is only one loaded class to implement the interface, choose it
> > * if there are more, choose the one with it's method invoked earlier
> > (compiled
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article09-205
Top 10 things likely to be overheard from a Klingon Programmer
==
10. Specifications are for the weak and timid!
9. You question the worthiness of my code? I should kill you where you
Hi everyone,
I have one more question:
Which exception should be thrown whose error code is unused?
Let's consider native throwJavaNetSocketException quoted from nethelp.c:
void
throwJavaNetSocketException (JNIEnv * env, I_32 errorNumber)
{
jclass aClass;
char *errorMessage = netLoo
On 7/17/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> On 7/13/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > (4)
>> > Launcher wants the vm dll in the "default" directory unless the option
>> > is specified. Should we realign the dr
On 7/17/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
> On 7/13/06, Oliver Deakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> or:
>> launcher calls CreateJavaVM()
>> CreateJavaVM() passes call to create_vm()
>> create_vm() makes its usual calls and
Hi Alexei,
I just downloaded the latest working build of TestNG 5.0 [1] and support
for the "jvm" attribute is in there. This is not the official release
build.
Best regards,
George
[1] http://testng.org/testng-5.0.zip
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
Hi George,
Agree, we may experience problems i
On 7/19/06, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried the test, and it failed as you said with RI on my WinXP. And I
also tried to pass in a read/write FileChannel got from
RandomAccessFile, the test passes.
Paulex, the test fails on my machine!
Seems RI returns 2*length instead of leng
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 19 July 2006 at 10:50, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> On 19 July 2006 at 10:18, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sounds dicey, depending on ant/jre? for this structure?
My intel-based mac reports i386,
fixing...
George Harley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Agreed. I think that the file is used in a couple of luni tests for
> java.lang.ClassLoader. No significance in the fact that it is a .c file
> and, as far as I can see, no special reason why it needs to be in the
> support folder.
>
> Best regards,
> Geo
FYI I've logged it as HARMONY-925 so we don't forget.
Regards,
Tim
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> BTW, my default locale is Russian
>
> 2006/7/18, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Sure,
>>
>> DecimalFormatTest:
>>
>> Testcase: test_parseLjava_lang_String_Ljava_text_ParsePositio
On 19 July 2006 at 10:50, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mark Hindess wrote:
> > On 19 July 2006 at 10:18, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sounds dicey, depending on ant/jre? for this structure?
> >>
> >> My intel-based mac reports i386, my T43 running windo
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Richard Liang wrote:
>
>> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
>> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through
toPattern.
>> Now the problem is the returned pattern is lo
Hi everyone,
If no one objects, I'd like to throw subclass of SocketException in native
code to fix this problem. Any suggestions, please kindly let me know.
Thanks!
On 7/18/06, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems most people prefer subclass to SocketException with
ErrorCodeExcepti
Hi,
Agreed. I think that the file is used in a couple of luni tests for
java.lang.ClassLoader. No significance in the fact that it is a .c file
and, as far as I can see, no special reason why it needs to be in the
support folder.
Best regards,
George
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 19 July 2006 at
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir,
I've applied both patches, but `segfault` is reproducible nevertheless.
gdb says that:
(gdb) run Hello
Starting program:
/export/lab_drlbuild/test_tmp/20060719/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin/ij
Hello
[Thread debugging using libthread_db e
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 19 July 2006 at 10:18, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sounds dicey, depending on ant/jre? for this structure?
>>
>> My intel-based mac reports i386, my T43 running windows returns x86 and
>> my T42 running ubuntu returns i386. I think they are all Sun J
On 19 July 2006 at 10:18, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds dicey, depending on ant/jre? for this structure?
>
> My intel-based mac reports i386, my T43 running windows returns x86 and
> my T42 running ubuntu returns i386. I think they are all Sun JREs.
>
> I'd argue that t
While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to
put to bed. Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these last week,
and I'd like to try again.
Would some number of days of discussion (like 3) plus a vote be an
acceptable way to get this resolved?
geir
--
sounds dicey, depending on ant/jre? for this structure?
My intel-based mac reports i386, my T43 running windows returns x86 and
my T42 running ubuntu returns i386. I think they are all Sun JREs.
I'd argue that the latter two are identical chip architectures and that
there will be shared code be
On 19 July 2006 at 9:56, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like we'd want to put it somewhere else?
Yes. Looks more like a resource file to me. Probably belongs in
modules/luni since that is where the tests are that refer to it.
-Mark.
---
;-)
Well, most of the (real) build breaks today have been my fault[0]. I
must have accidentally replied to the one that wasn't.
-Mark
[0] I'm going to have to consider buying shares in a brewery
On 19 July 2006 at 8:24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guilty of SVN not working?
The os.arch system property[0]? We discussed this on the list in March
I think when we create make/properties.xml to replace the
numerous implementations of platform properties that existed at the
time. I was simply removing the last remnant of the old properties.
-Mark.
[0] Or some canonical
Seems like we'd want to put it somewhere else?
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alexei,
I was quite surprised myself to discover that there was no "jvm"
attribute. However, on reflection, it's reasonable to believe that to
the majority of their users the precise VM used to test their
application and component code is not important.
The approach taken by the TestNG pr
If we include certs form 3rd parties IMHO it makes sense to download them and
generate our storage at build time.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/7/19, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>
>>> I'm integrating HARMONY-536, the JSS
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> George Harley wrote:
>
>> I think you are right. The kind of information we would want to have in
>> a Harmony cacerts file is available from CA web sites (e.g. Verisign and
>> Thawte). Inclusion of Thawte root certs requires accepting their license
>> which is availa
Guilty of SVN not working? You're a great guy and all, and we depend on
you for a lot, but I don't think this was your fault...
geir
Mark Hindess wrote:
> Guilty. I'm fixing this.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 19 July 2006 at 10:12, Apache Harmony Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Online report : http
I think that ia32 was more accurate than x86. What will you use for
windows.IA64? (or linux.IA64 for that matter?)
geir
Mark Hindess wrote:
> Windows users should take a look at the comments in the following change.
>
> Regards,
> -Mark.
>
> On 19 July 2006 at 10:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Harley wrote:
> I think you are right. The kind of information we would want to have in
> a Harmony cacerts file is available from CA web sites (e.g. Verisign and
> Thawte). Inclusion of Thawte root certs requires accepting their license
> which is available on the repository access page
I've asked Sun about this. It would be nice if people could re-use
their root cert store.
What format does IBM and BEA use?
geir
Boris Kuznetsov wrote:
> Quotation from JavaTM Cryptography Architecture
> API Specification & Reference
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoS
Hi George,
Agree, we may experience problems in case of VM hang or crash. I
suggest this only as a temporary solution. BTW, the fact that TestNG
ant task still doesn't have such attributes looks like a sign for me -
TestNG can be still immature in some aspects. Still comparing TestNG
and JUnit.
? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm Kubyshkin Alexander, student of the Novosibirsk State
> University(RUSSIA). I want to take part in the project, specifically to
> work with SOUND module. I started to work with sound.sampled interfaces
> and classes. I'm ready to suggest the interfaces
2006/7/19, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/7/19, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2006/7/13, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> >
> > When you load the messages using a ResourceBundle they also get loaded
> > all at once though, right?
> Ops, you are right.
Yes, but do not forg
2006/7/19, Denis Kishenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/7/13, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>
> When you load the messages using a ResourceBundle they also get loaded
> all at once though, right?
Ops, you are right.
Yes, but do not forget that in "usual method" you just load the
ResourceBundle.
Hi Alexei,
It's encouraging to hear that (Ant + TestNG + sample tests) all worked
fine together on Harmony. In answer to your question I suppose that the
ability to fork the tests in a separate VM means that we do not run the
risk of possible bugs in Harmony affecting the test harness and
the
2006/7/13, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When you load the messages using a ResourceBundle they also get loaded
all at once though, right?
Ops, you are right.
So question is which method is better?
message = Messages.getString("key.one");
or
message = Messages.key_one;
We have to do so
Probably my previous message was not clear enough.
Why can't we just invoke everything including ant on top of Harmony
for now? At least I was able to build and run test-14 examples from
TestNG 4.7 distribution solely on top of j9 + our classlib today.
C:\Java\testng-4.7\test-14>set JAVA_HOME=c:\
Hello,
I'd like to explain the correct work of verifier with invokespecial
instruction.
There are 2 structural constraints in Java VM Specification which are
directly related with invokespecial instruction:
1. About methods that instruction must invoke.
2. About protected methods invocation.
Th
Seems like the best choice is to start from a couple of easy heuristics:
* if there is only one loaded class to implement the interface, choose it
* if there are more, choose the one with it's method invoked earlier
(compiled
by some JIT, possibly, some other JIT),
* if we have many candidate m
Vladimir,
I've applied both patches, but `segfault` is reproducible nevertheless.
gdb says that:
(gdb) run Hello
Starting program:
/export/lab_drlbuild/test_tmp/20060719/trunk/build/lnx_ia32_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin/ij
Hello
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 10835
Hi Richard,
Actually the Ant task always runs the tests in a forked VM. At present,
however, the task does not support specifying the forked VM (i.e. there
is no equivalent to the JUnit Ant task's "jvm" attribute). This matter
has already been raised with the TestNG folks who seem happy to
in
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through toPattern.
Now the problem is the returned pattern is locale-dependent. I'm
uncertain about the reason to remove the as
Fixed in r423414.
-Mark.
On 19 July 2006 at 10:22, Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guilty. I'm fixing this.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 19 July 2006 at 10:12, Apache Harmony Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> :
> > Online report : http://ibmonly.hursley.ibm.com/continuum/win.ia32/servlet/c
Windows users should take a look at the comments in the following change.
Regards,
-Mark.
On 19 July 2006 at 10:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: hindessm
> Date: Wed Jul 19 03:07:00 2006
> New Revision: 423421
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=423421&view=rev
> Log:
> I've renamed
Can anybody say about the build status on Windows we have now?
Unfortunately, I cannot build for the recent sources due to the following
issue:
[exec] winFont.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "void
__cde
l throwNPException(struct JNIEnv_ *,char const *)" (
?throwNPException@@YA
Richard Liang wrote:
George Harley wrote:
Hi,
If annotations were to be used to help us categorise tests in order
to simplify the definition of test configurations - what's included
and excluded etc - then a core set of annotations would need to be
agreed by the project. Consider the possi
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I'm integrating HARMONY-536, the JSSE provider. Two things:
1) it's contributed to go into x-net, but the package namespace is
o.a.h.security.provider.jsse
so I wonder if this would be better off in the security
Just thinking about using TestNG to execute Harmony test cases. :-)
Look at our build.xml (e.g., modules/luni/build.xml), you will see
something like:
..
..
My question is the TestNG Ant task does not support attributes
"fork" and "jvm", how to run our
Hi,
Since the cacerts file contains root certificate information from
well-known CA outfits that in at least one case is already publicly
available I would hope that there is less of a legal problem than we
think. For instance, take a look at the Verisign root certificates
repository [1] whic
Guilty. I'm fixing this.
-Mark.
On 19 July 2006 at 10:12, Apache Harmony Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Online report : http://ibmonly.hursley.ibm.com/continuum/win.ia32/servlet/con
> tinuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/6/buildId/1845
> Build statistics:
> State: Error
>
Hmm, do we have problems with launching ant? I thought we have
problems with launching TestNG. Just checked - running tests for beans
on j9+fresh classlib works fine. I.e.
ant -Dbuild.module=beans
-Dbuild.compiler=org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompilerAdapter test
2006/7/19, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTE
Richard Liang wrote:
> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through toPattern.
> Now the problem is the returned pattern is locale-dependent. I'm
> uncertain about the reason to remove the assertion:
> 1) Becau
According to "TestNG Ant Task" [1], it seems that the TestNG Ant task
does not support to fork a new JVM, that is, we must launch ant using
Harmony itself. Any comments? Thanks a lot.
[1]http://testng.org/doc/ant.html
Best regards,
Richard
George Harley wrote:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/18/06
Quotation from JavaTM Cryptography Architecture
API Specification & Reference
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html#KeyManagement
"It implements the keystore as a file, using a proprietary keystore
type (format) named "JKS"."
On 7/19/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PRO
Hello,
I'm Kubyshkin Alexander, student of the Novosibirsk State
University(RUSSIA). I want to take part in the project,
specifically to work with SOUND module. I started to work with
sound.sampled interfaces and classes. I'm ready to suggest the
interfaces and some stubs. I've already fi
61 matches
Mail list logo
