Re: [build] Copying deploy directory for federated build

2006-08-07 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Mark Hindess wrote: > If all the copying is done > so as to fail if it attempts to overwrite anything, then we can see when > different components of the federated build are overwriting files from > other components. I agree with this statement, however, my original patch tried to eliminate copyi

Re: [build] Copying deploy directory for federated build

2006-08-07 Thread Mark Hindess
On 7 August 2006 at 18:49, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Geir, > > you have introduced copying of drlvm deploy directory to get the 'canonical' > build location > so that federated build could pick drlvm at predefined place. > > I think this is an overkill, making the build proces

Re: [build] Copying deploy directory for federated build

2006-08-07 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Salikh Zakirov wrote: > Geir, > > you have introduced copying of drlvm deploy directory to get the 'canonical' > build location > so that federated build could pick drlvm at predefined place. > > I think this is an overkill, making the build process longer with no obvious > benefits. Please

[build] Copying deploy directory for federated build

2006-08-07 Thread Salikh Zakirov
Geir, you have introduced copying of drlvm deploy directory to get the 'canonical' build location so that federated build could pick drlvm at predefined place. I think this is an overkill, making the build process longer with no obvious benefits. It also has a downside: contents of 'canonical'