Archie Cobbs wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
I notice that there is a common code path that goes:
_jc_derive_type_from_classfile which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile
_jc_derive_type_interp which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile (with, I think, the same arguments as before)
Is this correct? P
Mark Hindess wrote:
I notice that there is a common code path that goes:
_jc_derive_type_from_classfile which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile
_jc_derive_type_interp which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile (with, I think, the same arguments as before)
Is this correct? Perhaps we could avoid
Archie,
I notice that there is a common code path that goes:
_jc_derive_type_from_classfile which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile
_jc_derive_type_interp which calls:
_jc_parse_classfile (with, I think, the same arguments as before)
Is this correct? Perhaps we could avoid making the