sorry for being flippant -- I took your "Ok? sure" as agreement.
Since it is a reported bug in the existing code, with a patch that looks
good, I figured the (literally) 60 seconds it took me to release it into
HEAD may help out anyone who downloads the code in the time it takes to
merge security2
Tim Ellison wrote:
sorry for being flippant -- I took your "Ok? sure" as agreement.
Oh, definitely :)
Since it is a reported bug in the existing code, with a patch that looks
good, I figured the (literally) 60 seconds it took me to release it into
HEAD may help out anyone who downloads the
pointless, but ok.
geir
Tim Ellison wrote:
I'll race ya' :-)
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Good -- so what I'll do is to release George's patch to the com.ibm
version to get him working, on the understanding that the whole type
will become obsolete soon when the security2 c
@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-35) Harmony ignores java.security.policy
property
Hi George,
>
>The reason for this buggy behaviour is the incomplete implementation of
>com.ibm.oti.util.DefaultPolicy in the luni
I'll race ya' :-)
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Good -- so what I'll do is to release George's patch to the com.ibm
>> version to get him working, on the understanding that the whole type
>> will become obsolete soon when the security2 code is integrated. Ok?
>
> sure,
Tim Ellison wrote:
Good -- so what I'll do is to release George's patch to the com.ibm
version to get him working, on the understanding that the whole type
will become obsolete soon when the security2 code is integrated. Ok?
sure, but how long will it take us to integrate? We should just do
Thanks Tim.
George C. Harley
Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
20/01/2006 10:55
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [jira] Updated: (HARMONY-35) Harmony ignores java.security.
Good -- so what I'll do is to release George's patch to the com.ibm
version to get him working, on the understanding that the whole type
will become obsolete soon when the security2 code is integrated. Ok?
Regards,
Tim
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> Hi George,
>
>> The reason for this buggy behaviour
Hi George,
>
>The reason for this buggy behaviour is the incomplete implementation of
>com.ibm.oti.util.DefaultPolicy in the luni component. The readPolicy()
>method needs work to actually fulfill its contract as laid out in the
>Javadoc comments.
>
com.ibm.oti.util.DefaultPolicy extends java.sec
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-35?page=all ]
George Harley updated HARMONY-35:
-
Attachment: HARMONY-35-patch.txt
The attached patch seems to fix it for me on Win XP. Not tested on Linux.
Best regards,
George
> Harmony ignores java.sec
10 matches
Mail list logo
