>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:05 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
>
>On 26/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ti
On 26/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 25/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what the "fake" hard-coded locale is. I used to set the default
>> locale to some particular one, e.g., en_US, but it seems that someone
>> (Tim) does no
Tim Ellison wrote:
On 25/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure what the "fake" hard-coded locale is. I used to set the default
locale to some particular one, e.g., en_US, but it seems that someone
(Tim) does not like the idea. :-)
What I objected to was setting the locale
iling, and I can't figure out why.
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 7:47 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
>
>On 25/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL
On 25/07/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not sure what the "fake" hard-coded locale is. I used to set the default
locale to some particular one, e.g., en_US, but it seems that someone
(Tim) does not like the idea. :-)
What I objected to was setting the locale to a specific value t
>-Original Message-
>From: Richard Liang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:41 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
>
>
>
>Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Liang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:26 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
I don't think we need several test cases
>-Original Message-
>From: Richard Liang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:26 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
>
>
>
>Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
>>
>>> -Original
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:27 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTEC
>-Original Message-
>From: Paulex Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:27 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] locale dependent tests
>
>Andrew Zhang wrote:
>> On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Tim Ellison wrote:
Paulex Yang wrote:
I still confuse what we want to test, the logic or the data? I think
most (if not all) i18n related methods actually have same single
executable with multiple resource bundles, i.e., the single executable
should be locale-independent, the different return
Paulex Yang wrote:
> I still confuse what we want to test, the logic or the data? I think
> most (if not all) i18n related methods actually have same single
> executable with multiple resource bundles, i.e., the single executable
> should be locale-independent, the different return value is due to
Sounds reasonable.
SY, Alexey
2006/7/20, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Andrew Zhang wrote:
> On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> > Richard Liang wrote:
>> >
>> >> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
>> >> to
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Richard Liang wrote:
>
>> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
>> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through
toPattern.
>> Now the problem is the r
On 7/19/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Richard Liang wrote:
>
>> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
>> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through
toPattern.
>> Now the problem is the returned pattern is lo
Tim Ellison wrote:
Richard Liang wrote:
Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through toPattern.
Now the problem is the returned pattern is locale-dependent. I'm
uncertain about the reason to remove the as
Richard Liang wrote:
> Although the spec does not require the round-trip of applyPattern and
> toPattern, we still want to get one *certain* pattern through toPattern.
> Now the problem is the returned pattern is locale-dependent. I'm
> uncertain about the reason to remove the assertion:
> 1) Becau
17 matches
Mail list logo