, May 22, 2006 10:25 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-337) Contribution of RMI
framework
On 22 May 2006 at 21:20, "Zakharov, Vasily M"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By the way, if "rmi2" module is ITC donation and &q
Message-
> From: Vasily Zakharov (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 9:02 PM
> To: Zakharov, Vasily M
> Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-337) Contribution of RMI framework
>
> [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-337?page=3Dcomments#
vision
-Original Message-
From: Vasily Zakharov (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 9:02 PM
To: Zakharov, Vasily M
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-337) Contribution of RMI framework
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-337?page=comments#action
Hi Geir,
I'll take it.
Best regards,
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
9 +1 votes, no others.
Someone want to re-assign to themselves and bring this in?
Please make sure that the initial commit is *identical* to what was
contributed, and then do any tweaks, fixes, moves etc from there.
gei
9 +1 votes, no others.
Someone want to re-assign to themselves and bring this in?
Please make sure that the initial commit is *identical* to what was
contributed, and then do any tweaks, fixes, moves etc from there.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Ha
+1
Tim Ellison wrote:
> +1
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
>> that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
>>
>> This is the contribution from Intel.
>>
>> Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into th
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
> that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
>
> This is the contribution from Intel.
>
> Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
> class libra
+1
George
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class librar
+1
Thanks,
Stepan
On 5/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Har
+1
Thanks,
Mikhail
>-Original Message-
>From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:46 AM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-337 : Contribution of RMI
framework
>
>
>I have received
+1
Dan Lydick
> [Original Message]
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 5/8/06 7:49:01 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-337 : Contribution of RMI framework
>
>
> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I c
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 6:46 PM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Acceptance of HARMONY-337 : Contribution of RMI framework
>
>
> I have received the ACQs and
+1
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ]
I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-337, so I can assert
that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN.
This is the contribution from Intel.
Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony
class library :
[ ] + 1 Accept
[ ] -1 Reject (pro
they also have to compare
two implementations.
please comment on each, and add/remove if I'm missing something.
Thanks,
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [rmi] package compari
operability.
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [rmi] package comparison (was Re: Contribution of RMI
framework)
Daniel,
black-box testing (reverse engineering I would call the comple
our
implememtation behaved differently than the RI.
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:17 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rmi] package comparison (was Re: Contribution of RMI
framework)
Zakharov, Vasil
nt: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:43 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
Vasily,
I was not looking for public "general" designs of RMI, I do
know them very well :) thanks anyway...
I asked about specific design docs of your implementation
vision
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:17 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rmi] package comparison (was Re: Contribution of RMI
framework)
Vasily,
You are not missing anything, our package does
it, but its ok if you do
not have them handy.
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework
Daniel,
Regretfully, we have no specific top level design d
oducts Division
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:17 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [rmi] package comparison (was Re: Contribution of RMI
framework)
Vasily,
You are not missing anything, our package d
course at
http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/rmi/RMI.html
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:17 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
Vasily,
I&#
8, 2006 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: [rmi] package comparison (was Re: Contribution of RMI
framework)
Daniel,
I've been trying to do some comparisons, as I promised, and I believe
I'm missing something.
I was testing the interoperability, and when I tried to use an "Intel"
RMI client agains
find more info about our design
here http://www.itc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/architecture.html
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
I completelly agree with Vas
tem.err.println("SUCCESS");
} catch (Throwable e) {
e.printStackTrace();
System.err.println("FAIL");
}
}
}
all.policy:
grant{
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[E
or your comments.
Thanks,
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework
Daniel,
Yeah, I'm also looking forward to a good discussion on that.
And I do b
v, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework
Hi, Mikhail,
Regretfully, the method-to-method comparison would hardly be effective
with RMI, as it's a highly integrated component.
80% of implementation i
pril 14, 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework
Hi, Mikhail,
Regretfully, the method-to-method comparison would hardly be effective
with RMI, as it's a highly integrated component.
80% of implementation is hidden in non-public API, and some components
(e. g. RMIC) have no publi
14, 2006 7:53 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
I think we need compare contributions method by method to assemble
the best classlib
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/4/14, Daniel Gandara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Vasily,
>good to know that there i
t: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
Cool!
How does this compare to the other RMI framework that also has been
donated? Any thoughts?
geir
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project
> on
> behalf of Intel corporatio
armony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework
Vasily,
good to know that there is someone out there who has also
been working on rmi; I believe we'll have a lot to share and discuss
about it.
Thanks,
Daniel
- Original Message -
From: &quo
to share and discuss
> about it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Daniel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:53 PM
> Subject: Contribution of RMI framework
>
>
> Hi, a
, April 12, 2006 9:53 PM
Subject: Contribution of RMI framework
Hi, all,
I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project
on
behalf of Intel corporation. This contribution contains the
implementation
of RMI framework.
The archive with this contribution can be found at:
htt
Cool!
How does this compare to the other RMI framework that also has been
donated? Any thoughts?
geir
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project
on
behalf of Intel corporation. This contribution contains the
implementation
of R
Hi, all,
I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project
on
behalf of Intel corporation. This contribution contains the
implementation
of RMI framework.
The archive with this contribution can be found at:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-337
The Remote Method
36 matches
Mail list logo
