Re: FYI missing mail

2006-02-10 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Process note : (George : I don't believe that there's any problem here, but using it as an example.) If you ever are in the situation where you will forward a private exchange to a public list, be sure to ask all participants in the exchange for permission. People can react in different and

Re: FYI missing mail

2006-02-10 Thread George Harley
Hi, Aha ! Mystery solved. I must have screwed up when replying to one of Stepan's earlier posts. Thanks Stepan. Here is a paste of last week's dialogue then that *I thought* was going to the list Best regards, George paste of note from George to Stepan sent on 1st

verifying signed jars (was: Re: FYI missing mail)

2006-02-10 Thread Tim Ellison
Stepan Mishura wrote: > Returning back to the 'missing post'. I agreed with suggestion but currently > we don't have Harmony provider so we should define how we locate 'trusted > provides' to be secure. We just need a trusted SHA1PRNG, right? then we can open signed providers' jars and get any ot

Re: FYI missing mail

2006-02-09 Thread Stepan Mishura
On 2/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > George Harley wrote: > > > >> The post I want to refer to does not seem to be in the > >> mailing list archive (!!??!) > > > > I don't remember you saying that (and I would have remembered such an > > eloquent

Re: FYI missing mail

2006-02-09 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
Tim Ellison wrote: George Harley wrote: The post I want to refer to does not seem to be in the mailing list archive (!!??!) I don't remember you saying that (and I would have remembered such an eloquent and considered post ;-) ) I didn't get it either, and as he George said, it's not in t

FYI missing mail (was: Re: [Fwd: svn commit: r376144 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/security2/make/build.xml])

2006-02-09 Thread Tim Ellison
George Harley wrote: > The post I want to refer to does not seem to be in the > mailing list archive (!!??!) I don't remember you saying that (and I would have remembered such an eloquent and considered post ;-) ) I still have mail that far back in my reader, and it looks like I didn't get it ei