That package name looks good -- thanks Karan.
(sorry for the slow response)
Tim
karan malhi wrote:
> Since nobody objected to this package structure, I will just assume the
> package to be org.apache.harmony.accessibility.internal
>
> Paulex Yang wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure myself, but I persona
Since nobody objected to this package structure, I will just assume the
package to be org.apache.harmony.accessibility.internal
Paulex Yang wrote:
I'm not sure myself, but I personally think that is fine.
There is also a "Resources" directory in every source folder, I have
no idea what it
I'm not sure myself, but I personally think that is fine.
There is also a "Resources" directory in every source folder, I have no
idea what it is used for. Anyone can help?
karan malhi wrote:
Thanks Paulex,
What about ResourceBundles specific to a package like for example
javax.accessibi
Thanks Paulex,
What about ResourceBundles specific to a package like for example
javax.accessibility. Should we put the ResourceBundles in
org.apache.harmony.accessibility.internal ?
Paulex Yang wrote:
Karan,
karan malhi wrote:
Hi,
The javax.accessibility.AccessibleBundle class requires
Karan,
karan malhi wrote:
Hi,
The javax.accessibility.AccessibleBundle class requires a default
ResourceBundle.
1. Which package would we put the default resource bundle classes in?
Currently the resource bundles are located in
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/harmony/enhanced/cl
Hi,
The javax.accessibility.AccessibleBundle class requires a default
ResourceBundle.
1. Which package would we put the default resource bundle classes in?
2. What locales are supported by Harmony?
--
Karan Singh
