Hi Nadya,
We should actually do the reverse. Hold the discussion and decisions
online, and then make sure that the documents, eg, the VM Developer's Guide
etc. are not outdated.
Thanks,
Rana
On 8/17/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>All,
>I found some GC requirements descr
On 8/15/06, Robin Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
> All,
>
> There is rough consensus that the immediate goal for Harmony JVM is to
> reliably run simple commercial workloads with acceptable performance.
> In regards to a garbage collector for a Harmony JVM in 2006 there
On 8/17/06, Morozova, Nadezhda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I found some GC requirements description in the OPEN spec [1], section
5.3.5 and something inside 6.*. How does those suggestions relate to
what is being discussed?
Actually section 5.3.5 describes an interface between GC and JVM.
All,
I found some GC requirements description in the OPEN spec [1], section
5.3.5 and something inside 6.*. How does those suggestions relate to
what is being discussed?
Do you think we can use that doc as the basis and maybe track major
decisions there? Mail threads tend to drop, and are not a
On 8/15/06, Robin Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weldon Washburn wrote:
> All,
>
> There is rough consensus that the immediate goal for Harmony JVM is to
> reliably run simple commercial workloads with acceptable performance.
> In regards to a garbage collector for a Harmony JVM in 2006 there
Weldon Washburn wrote:
All,
There is rough consensus that the immediate goal for Harmony JVM is to
reliably run simple commercial workloads with acceptable performance.
In regards to a garbage collector for a Harmony JVM in 2006 there are
some data points worth noting. 1) A quick survey shows m
