Whoops. Fixed and deployed. Thanks, and sorry about that.
geir
On Sep 22, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
Geir,
In the website, the folder docs/documentation does not seem to have a
copy of the site.css file for some reason. This way, pages
documentation.html, build_website.h
Geir,
In the website, the folder docs/documentation does not seem to have a
copy of the site.css file for some reason. This way, pages
documentation.html, build_website.html and a couple of others look real
ugly. Could you please fix?
I've verified all other pages on the website, they look j
xdocs/site.css
the build should take care of the rest. if not, I screwed up :)
geir
Best regards,
Nadya Morozova
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:39 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] prob
]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:39 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [doc] problem w/ css locally?
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> I see Tim and Nadya discussed this already.
>>
>> I think we want to kee
On Sep 22, 2006, at 8:04 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I see Tim and Nadya discussed this already.
I think we want to keep it as error-free as possible... I'm going to
try to just copy site.css on deployment - it means we still only
maintain one copy, but then offli
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I see Tim and Nadya discussed this already.
>
> I think we want to keep it as error-free as possible... I'm going to
> try to just copy site.css on deployment - it means we still only
> maintain one copy, but then offline and online is the same experience.
I tend to
On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that would work, but again, it takes away the simplicity of never
having to think about it - what you see locally is what you get when
you deploy, which is a really, really good
On 9/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that would work, but again, it takes away the simplicity of never
having to think about it - what you see locally is what you get when
you deploy, which is a really, really good QA benefit.
the other problem with relativised urls is that
that would work, but again, it takes away the simplicity of never
having to think about it - what you see locally is what you get when
you deploy, which is a really, really good QA benefit.
geir
On Sep 21, 2006, at 12:44 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMA
On 9/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see Tim and Nadya discussed this already.
I think we want to keep it as error-free as possible... I'm going to
try to just copy site.css on deployment - it means we still only
maintain one copy, but then offline and online is the same
On Sep 21, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
are you practising for the faq :-) ?
the hack is to point to a local copy (and remember not to check the
hack
in).
LOL
geir
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm doing some website work, and things aren't working locally.
I can of course
I see Tim and Nadya discussed this already.
I think we want to keep it as error-free as possible... I'm going to
try to just copy site.css on deployment - it means we still only
maintain one copy, but then offline and online is the same experience.
geir
On Sep 21, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Geir
are you practising for the faq :-) ?
the hack is to point to a local copy (and remember not to check the hack
in).
Tim
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I'm doing some website work, and things aren't working locally.
>
> I can of course build, but when I look at the generated results, it
> can't find
13 matches
Mail list logo
