ison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:30 AM
> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [classlib] generics puzzler (was: Re: Thanks Stepan! (was: Re:
> [jira] Resolved: (HARMONY-454) [classlib][luni] java.util.Set generics
> uplift and related changes))
>
But the question remains in my mind whether there is any generic type
definition you could write that would allow you to cast the entrySet()
to a "Set>"
equivalent?
To put it another way, I would expect that
for (Map.Entry entry : map.entrySet())
should complain that the declaration of '
Nathan,
It's a tricky one to be sure.
The problem is that the entrySet() method is returning a
"Set>",
which is incompatible with the type "Set>". It's easier to describe why if I drop the "extends K"
and "extends V" part. So we have "Set" and
"Set>".
The first one, "Set>" is a set of Map.Entri
On 5/10/06, Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:
> 2) To avoid casting while-loop was replaced with for-loop. Could you
review the change?
I was scratching my head about this cast, so I was very pleased to see
your elegant solution.
I must admit that I don't really understand why t
Does someone understand why this works this way? This seems so odd. I know
there are quirks to the generics syntax, but this in an edge I haven't run
into yet. I haven't been able to make this one click in my head yet.
This compiles fine:
public synchronized void putAll(Map map) {
