.apache.org
>
>
> To
> harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi George,
>
> Thanks for your clarifications
>
> Could you please try setting 'printAllowed' to false in th
est regards,
George
George C. Harley
Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16/01/2006 12:27
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi George,
remember a while back on
> >>another project that I knew the timings of things on my machine just
> >>from practice, and I could tell when we changed something that impacted
> >>performance, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
> >>early.
> >>
ests ran longer. This helped catch problems
early.
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail Loenko
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit test c
__
> George C. Harley
>
>
>
>
>
> "Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 16/01/2006 04:42
> Please respond to
> harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
g that impacted
>>performance, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
>>early.
>>
>>geir
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Mikhail Loenko
>>>Intel Middleware Products Division
>>>
>>>
>>>>-
s,
George
George C. Harley
"Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16/01/2006 04:42
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi George
We will remove all the tests and these QA guys will never disturb us :)
E
, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
> early.
>
> geir
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail Loenko
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for your very complete answer.
At some point we had different functionality in the
PerformanceTest but it seems to have died now. That is
George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
>Hi Mikhail,
>
>Thanks for your very complete answer.
>
>> At some point we had different functionality in
"Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
13/01/2006 12:12
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
As far as we did not have special performance tests, we used unit tests
to measure performance, i.e. to compare perform
As far as we did not have special performance tests, we used unit tests
to measure performance, i.e. to compare performance of our classes to
performance of "standard" classes. So we ran in cycle a single unit test
on both when there are our security classes in bootclasspath and when
there are not.
12 matches
Mail list logo
