karan malhi wrote:
> Could there be a switch to over-ride the global exclude list
> entry/entries? This way a module by default would use a global exclude
> list and also have the freedom to ignore it and use the module exclude
> list.
In the incoming HARMONY-57 contribution the list is 'global',
karan malhi wrote:
Could there be a switch to over-ride the global exclude list
entry/entries? This way a module by default would use a global exclude
list and also have the freedom to ignore it and use the module exclude
list.
I don't know what having two exclude lists would mean - a test
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>
>> The exclusion list is implemented as a (declarative) XML file read when
>> the tests run -- in HARMONY-57 you can see one in
>> Harmony_Tests/src/test/resources/config/jcltest-excludes.xml
>>
>> Picking an entry at random from there:
>>
Tim Ellison wrote:
The exclusion list is implemented as a (declarative) XML file read when
the tests run -- in HARMONY-57 you can see one in
Harmony_Tests/src/test/resources/config/jcltest-excludes.xml
Picking an entry at random from there:
...
Undiagnosed failur
Could there be a switch to over-ride the global exclude list
entry/entries? This way a module by default would use a global exclude
list and also have the freedom to ignore it and use the module exclude list.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
However, I did imagine that we'd give the modules a bit of fr
On 2/16/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's true, but I always imagined that people would be working in
> > the modules anyway, so there isn't much gain.
>
> Modules should be as self-sufficient as we can make them, so devolving
> tests and their exclude lists into a module m
+1
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
I see at least the fo
On 2/16/06, Tim Ellison gmail.com> wrote:
> Applying a style sheet makes it easy to read the exclusions list in
> glorious technicolor, either in an individual module or as a combined
> global view.
I see. And global view will be very helpful
Thanks,
Stepan
On 2/16/06, Tim Ellison gmail.com>
On 2/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
> > exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
> > tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
>
> That wo
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Stepan Mishura wrote:
>> Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
>> exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
>> tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
>
> That would be the goal :)
>
>> I see a
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
That would be the goal :)
I see at least the following benefits of creat
11 matches
Mail list logo
