On 2/17/06, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fernando Cassia wrote:
> > Stefano,
> >
> > Are you a Mac user, per chance? Because you sound like one...
>
> Do you have a problem with that?
>
> --
> Stefano.
>
>
No, but I figured because you mentioned Quicktime for Java. Which nobody
Fernando Cassia wrote:
Stefano,
Are you a Mac user, per chance? Because you sound like one...
Do you have a problem with that?
--
Stefano.
On 2/17/06, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fernando Cassia schrieb:
>
> >Which defeats the whole purpose of cross-platform java in the first
> place.
> >So why not do it win32 / linux /Gtk then?
> >
> >
> Because Java as a programming language has other advantages than
> platform
Fernando Cassia schrieb:
Which defeats the whole purpose of cross-platform java in the first place.
So why not do it win32 / linux /Gtk then?
Because Java as a programming language has other advantages than
platform independence.
Tor
On 2/17/06, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If platform dependency is accepted,
> there are also a lot of e.g. ActiveX-bridges allowing ActiveX-enabled
> media components (also GUI or video widgets) to be integrated in a Java
> application.
>
> Tor
Which defeats the whole purpose
Stefano Mazzocchi schrieb:
It's called "quicktime for java" and has been there for years :-)
Sure, Quicktime for Java is not that bad, but unfortunately using
heavyweight native GUI widgets, which are difficult to integrate without
side effects in a Swing application. If platform dependency
Stefano,
Are you a Mac user, per chance? Because you sound like one...
See below:
On 2/17/06, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > This can't be a Java issue - it must be the
> > design-by-committee-for-all-platforms-ever-to-be problem...
> >
> > I would l
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
This can't be a Java issue - it must be the
design-by-committee-for-all-platforms-ever-to-be problem...
I would love to see a good sound API in the style of SWT.
It's called "quicktime for java" and has been there for years :-)
--
Stefano.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
But look at the bright side: there are probably many other really
simple yet useful things that can be done to make java more useful on
the desktop and this will be a marketing win for alternative JVMs.
That would be to be able to write small java programs which sta
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> This can't be a Java issue - it must be the
> design-by-committee-for-all-platforms-ever-to-be problem...
>
> I would love to see a good sound API in the style of SWT.
>
> Call it JavaAudio...
... and implement it on Harmony code, we'd be very receptive to patches
and
This can't be a Java issue - it must be the
design-by-committee-for-all-platforms-ever-to-be problem...
I would love to see a good sound API in the style of SWT.
Call it JavaAudio...
Tor-Einar Jarnbjo wrote:
Fernando Cassia wrote:
I'm still scratching my bald head thinking why hasn't Googl
Fernando Cassia wrote:
I'm still scratching my bald head thinking why hasn't Google embraced
desktop
java yet. Google Talk would be a killer app written in Swing / 100% Pure
Java.
It's never stupid to stay realistic. There is no JavaSound
implementation giving you enough control of e.g. the
On 2/16/06, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We need to find the tab-browsing-equivalent of a JVM ;-)
It's simple, Google should make one of their apps a cross-platform, Swing
based java one.
Google, unlike Sun, will then have the marketing power to convince vendors
to preload
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On 2/16/06, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
which implements a very interesting trick to speed up java startup
performance: save the hotspot information in a repository (at JVM shut
down) so that the JIT doesn't have to wait when it starts until it knows
what
Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>> You try to sound clever by making that statement, but imho, despite any
>> other speed-up work who might be implemented, Sun's solution
>> is very important, and something that should have been implemented a
On 2/16/06, Fernando Cassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> You try to sound clever by making that statement, but imho, despite any
> other speed-up work who might be implemented, Sun's solution
> is very important, and something that should have been implemented a long,
> long time ago. I welc
Fernando Cassia gmail.com> writes:
> I wonder why no one has tought about having java auto-load at startup and
> having a single instance of the Java VM running all the time, and then pass
> control of the first loaded java application to it (as Mozilla or Firefox
> pre-loads itself at boot time
17 matches
Mail list logo
